CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA PACKET 8-11-26

City of Pleasanton July 27, 2026 Page 3 These studies are critical because the District's utility master plans have not considered the impacts of the District providing wastewater treatment service to Arroyo Lago, the East Lakes Project, and other adjacent developments which are proposed for annexation to the City, and the impacts of the District providing wastewater service to this area have not yet been analyzed. Consistent with the agreement between reached between 330 Land Company, LLC, and the District, the District therefore asks the City to include the following two conditions when the City Council approves the Project: (1) To determine the impacts on the District’s system, the Landowner will prepare or agree to fund preparation of additional utility analyses, to be performed by a consultant of the District's choosing, and the results of the analyses to be approved in the District's sole discretion; and (2) The Landowner will be required to mitigate any impacts identifled by the utility analyses, including paying its fair share of any infrastructure improvements required to serve the Project in whole or in part. These utility analyses are necessary because the Final EIR fails to analyze the impacts to the East Amador Lift Station (EALS) and other associated improvements which will be needed to mitigate the Project's signiflcant direct and cumulative environmental impacts. As described in Section 6.4.3 of the 2024 Woodard Curran Sewer System Capacity Evaluation Report (the "Capacity Report"), which was included in Appendix A – WWTP Supporting Information for the Final EIR, the District owns and operates EALS, which conveys fiows generated within the City to the regional WWTP. Under the 1992 agreement between the City and the District, the District is required to operate and maintain EALS, and the City is responsible to pay for these improvements, since they exclusively beneflt service connections within the City. As noted in the Capacity Report, the City's 2007 Master Plan recognized that the EALS pump station is undersized for current fiows and improvements are needed. Thus, the current facilities already fail to meet industry standards, and the additional connections that will result from the Project and other development in the east Pleasanton area will exacerbate this existing problem. Utility analyses must evaluate the range of improvements that will be needed to address both the current and anticipated future deflciencies due to increased fiows resulting from annexation and the additional service connections generated by this Project. It is odd that the City's comments on the County's EIR for this Project noted the lack of this analysis, but the City failed to remedy this known deflciency when it prepared the Addendum. Speciflcally, in its comments on the Draft EIR (PLEASANTON-62), the City indicated Alternative 2 does not include sufficient detail to enable the City to rely on the Page 158 of 373