My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA PACKET 9-1-26
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2026
>
090126 REGULAR
>
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA PACKET 9-1-26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2026 2:46:40 PM
Creation date
8/27/2026 2:41:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/1/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
348
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Lisjan Nation ATTACHMENT 5 <br />Public Comments <br /> <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br /> <br />Thank you for this additional information. There is no need to formally meet until the Tribe <br />has reviewed the requested documents. If you could get us those documents asap, we <br />would greatly appreciate it! Thank you again and take care. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Uuha'yi (With Gratitude), <br /> <br />Jon Kunkel, Tribal Administrative Assistant <br />Confederated Villages of Lisjan Nation <br /> <br /> <br />On Tue, Apr 7, 2026 at 3:15 PM Shweta Bonn <sbonn@cityofpleasantonca.gov> wrote: <br />Good day, Jon, <br /> <br />Thank you for your email and for contacting me about the consultation offer. I am happy to <br />speak with you further and provide more information. Would it be acceptable to you to set <br />up a time to discuss? We can talk on the phone, set up a virtual meeting on Teams or <br />Zoom, or meet in person at Pleasanton City Hall. <br /> <br />In summary – Under the provisions of Senate Bill 10, the City is considering rezoning up to <br />two properties to allow up to ten units on each property, as implementation of its Housing <br />Element. <br /> <br />The rezonings are the first step to conferring the capacity for the ten units and therefore <br />currently, no development plans are part of the subject scope (and hence no specific <br />details on proposed ground disturbance). <br />State law exempts both the rezoning and development from the California Environmental <br />Quality Act (CEQA), and therefore, no cultural resource reports have been prepared for this <br />effort. <br /> <br />Page 323 of 344
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.