RES 2026066 - Laserfiche WebLink

ARROYO LAGO RESIDENTIAL PROJECT ADDENDUM 98 FCS Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/2148/21480036/Addendum/21480036 Arroyo Lago Residential Project Addendum.docx 2026). A response was received from Wilton Rancheria on March 17, 2026, stating that the Tribe did not have any comments and did not wish to open consultation at this time. The Lisjan Nation responded on March 17, 2026, requesting additional information related to the proposed project. The City provided additional information in response to their request, and the Tribe did not request any further consultation. No other responses were received pursuant to SB 18 consultation requirements. The proposed project would still require the implementation of MM CUL-2a, MM CUL-2b, and MM CUL-3 to reduce potential impacts on TCRs to a less than significant level. As such, the proposed project’s impacts related to TCRs would be less than significant with mitigation, consistent with the impact conclusions of the Prior FEIR. Therefore, the proposed project would not introduce new significant impacts or create substantially more severe significant impacts than those previously identified in the Prior FEIR. No additional analysis is required. e) Lead Agency Determined Tribal Cultural Resources Would the project: Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a Tribal Cultural Resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American Tribe , and that is a resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1? Prior FEIR Conclusions The Prior FEIR found that no TCRs were identified during Tribal consultation or field investigations. Nonetheless, given that inadvertent discovery of TCRs during construction activities is always possible, the Prior FEIR identified MM CUL-2a, MM CUL-2b, and MM CUL-3, which would apply to ensure appropriate evaluation and treatment if such resources are discovered during construction. With respect to Alternative 2, ground disturbance would be less than that of the County Project, reducing the area where archaeological or TCRs could be affected. While mitigation for inadvertent discovery would still be required, the overall potential for impact would be lower than the County Project. (Draft EIR, p. 6-14). Therefore, the Prior FEIR concluded that impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. (Draft EIR, pp. 3.4-28, 6-14). Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion Because the proposed project would be constructed in the same location as the County Project, the findings of the Tribal consultation and field investigations conducted under the Prior FEIR would still apply. Additionally, as described above, the City completed Tribal consultation pursuant to SB 18. A response was received from Wilton Rancheria on March 17, 2026, stating that the Tribe did not have any comments and did not wish to open consultation at this time. The Lisjan Nation responded on Plan Amendment was not previously triggered by the County Project, SB 18 consultation with California Native American Tribes is required prior to its adoption by the City.