Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2026 Resolution Packet <br /> <br />Background Information for Resolution <br /> <br />Source: City of Murrieta <br /> <br />Background: <br />California cities are responsible for planning residential growth, adopting general <br />plans and zoning regulations, reviewing development proposals, and providing or <br />coordinating the infrastructure and public services necessary to support new <br />housing. Since 2010, the State has enacted more than 500 housing-related laws <br />that have increasingly shifted housing and land use authority away from local <br />governments. These laws have expanded by-right development, limited locally <br />adopted standards and review processes, and established enforcement <br />mechanisms, including the builder’s remedy, that may override local plans and <br />zoning. Although these measures are frequently presented as solutions to housing <br />affordability, many increase development capacity or restrict local review <br />without delivering the meaningful production of housing needed to address the <br />housing crisis. <br />At the same time, the State has continued to prioritize increased development <br />capacity without adequately accounting for the infrastructure, public services, <br />economic realities, and safety measures necessary to support housing growth. <br />State mandates often fail to reflect local conditions, including roadway and utility <br />capacity, water availability, wildfire exposure, environmental limitations, fiscal <br />impacts, and the availability of essential services. Cities are consequently required <br />to accommodate additional housing while receiving no funding or assistance to <br />address the resulting infrastructure and service demands. <br />Local elected officials are directly accountable to the residents who experience <br />the effects of development decisions and are responsible for balancing housing <br />production with infrastructure capacity, public safety, environmental protection, <br />fiscal sustainability, and community needs. Cities of all types in California have <br />been grappling with this dynamic, ranging from urban to rural, coastal to inland, <br />small to large, northern to southern, voicing concerns to legislative representatives <br />with minimal responsiveness. This is an issue of statewide concern that needs the <br />strength and diversity of the League of California Cities to pursue a long-term <br />solution. <br />The proposed resolution directs the League of California Cities to establish a <br />statewide working group to evaluate a constitutional amendment or other <br />legislative, policy, or ballot-based strategies to restore and strengthen local <br />authority over housing and land use decisions. The working group would be <br />tasked with developing a more balanced framework that preserves the State’s <br />role in establishing broad housing goals and enforcing constitutional, civil rights, <br />fair housing, building, life-safety, and environmental requirements, while restoring <br />meaningful local authority to allow cities to determine how statewide housing <br />9 <br />Page 299 of 318