My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA 9-15-26
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2026
>
091526 REGULAR
>
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA 9-15-26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/9/2026 2:42:57 PM
Creation date
9/9/2026 2:40:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/15/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
325
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Discussion: <br />The resolution does not prescribe a specific policy mechanism. The eight letters <br />in support recommend creating a working group or committee to evaluate <br />potential approaches, including legislative proposals, constitutional <br />amendments, or ballot initiatives to strengthen local authority over housing and <br />land use matters. <br /> <br />A discussion of a strategy to restore and strengthen local authority over housing <br />and land use matters will need to consider the California Constitution’s <br />framework for both preemption of police power enactments and municipal <br />affairs, discussed above. It will also need to determine whether changes to the <br />California Constitution will be proposed, and whether they constitute an <br />amendment or a revision, which require different processes. <br /> <br />A constitutional revision is a multistep process blending legislative consensus, <br />voter support, and on occasion, a constitutional convention. It requires <br />significant public engagement. <br /> <br />A constitutional amendment would require a ballot initiative, which includes <br />gathering enough valid signatures to qualify for the ballot, building large <br />coalitions to support election efforts, and campaigning to voters to support the <br />initiative. This process can involve significant costs. In the last major election for <br />ballot initiatives in 2024, proponents spent $8-$18 million to qualify for the ballot <br />and spent nearly $700 million for the full election cycle, averaging out to about <br />$100 million per ballot initiative. <br /> <br />Cal Cities has been engaged in ballot advocacy for over 20 years. In the early <br />2000s, Cal Cities developed a ballot advocacy infrastructure that included <br />forming an issue political action committee, fundraising, establishing a network <br />of regional managers, and building a coalition with other organizations to <br />ultimately advocate on a ballot measure. Ballot advocacy requires the <br />approval of the Board of Directors with a supermajority vote. <br /> <br />In the Legislature, Cal Cities plays an active and influential role to ensure that <br />local flexibility and autonomy in the land use and housing space is maintained <br />by engaging on dozens of bills every legislative session to ensure that cities' <br />voices are heard at the state Capitol. Below, you will find Cal Cities “Existing <br />Policy” on local control, housing, and land use policies. <br /> <br />Fiscal Impact <br />The resolution itself would not have a significant direct fiscal impact. However, <br />depending on what actions follow, the fiscal costs could be significant. <br /> <br /> <br />26 <br />Page 316 of 318
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.