My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Planning Commission Agenda Packet 09092026
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2026
>
09-09
>
Planning Commission Agenda Packet 09092026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2026 12:59:11 PM
Creation date
9/10/2026 12:50:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/9/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1218
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton—Additional Housing Sites Rezonings Project <br />Addendum CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 Addendum <br /> <br /> <br />106 <br />Environmental Issue <br />Area <br />Prior FEIR <br />Determination <br />New or More <br />Severe <br />Impacts? <br />New <br />Circumstances <br />Involving New <br />or More Severe <br />Impacts? <br />New <br />Information <br />Requiring New <br />Analysis or <br />Verification? <br />Applicable <br />Mitigation <br />Measures <br />XII. Mineral Resources <br />Would the project: <br />a) Result in the loss of <br />availability of a <br />known mineral <br />resource that <br />would be of value <br />to the region and <br />the residents of the <br />State? <br />Less than <br />significant <br />impact <br />No No No None <br />b) Result in the loss of <br />availability of a <br />locally important <br />mineral resource <br />recovery site <br />delineated on a <br />local general plan, <br />specific plan or <br />other land use <br />plan? <br />Less than <br />significant <br />impact <br />No No No None <br /> <br />a, b) Loss of Minerals Resources of Statewide or Local Importance <br />Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that <br />would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? <br /> b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral <br />resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, <br />specific plan or other land use plan? <br />Summary of Prior FEIR <br />The Prior FEIR concluded that because the majority of development <br />associated with the General Plan would concentrate in built-out areas, and <br />because the General Plan would continue to designate areas currently used <br />for sand and gravel harvesting for such purposes, implementation of the <br />General Plan would result in a less than significant impact with respect to <br />mineral resources. <br />Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion <br />The proposed sites are urban infill sites and are already developed. No <br />activities related to mineral resources currently occur within the potential sites
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.