PC-2026-21 - Laserfiche WebLink

RESOLUTION NO. PC-2026-21 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF STUDENTS (FROM 20 TO 40) AT ANY ONE TIME FOR AN EXISTING TUTORING SCHOOL, LOCATED AT 2709 STONERIDGE DRIVE, SUITE 110, AS FILED UNDER CASE NO. P26-0258 WHEREAS, on March 31, 2026, Shilpa Eaga for iCode School, as the applicant, applied for Conditional Use Permit (“CUP”) approval to increase the maximum number of students at any one time from 20 to 40 on site at any one time for an existing tutoring school (hereinafter “the Project”); and WHEREAS, the subject property is located at 2709 Stoneridge Drive, Suite 110, on Assessor Parcel No. 946-4623-2 (hereinafter “the Property”); and WHEREAS, the Property has a General Plan land use designation of Retail/Highway/Service Commercial/Business and Professional Offices, Medium Density Residential, High Density Residential, and Parks and Recreation; and WHEREAS, the subject property is within the boundaries of the Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan Amendment/Staples Ranch and bears a Specific Plan land use designation of Retail/Commercial; and WHEREAS, the Property is zoned PUD-C (Planned Unit Development – Commercial) District; and WHEREAS, a tutoring school is a conditionally permitted use in the subject zoning district and PUD and requires Planning Commission approval of a CUP for over 20 students at any one time; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 65906 of the Government Code, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Project on September 9, 2026, at which time all interested parties had the opportunity to be heard. The Planning Commission considered the staff report dated September 9, 2026, incorporated herein by reference, and all written and oral testimony. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of Pleasanton does resolve, declare, determine, and order the following: Section 1: Prior to acting on the Project, and at a properly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission reviewed written and oral staff reports, conducted a public hearing on the Project and took testimony, and received into the record all pertinent documents related to the Project (collectively, the “Record Evidence”). The Planning Commission’s determination is based on the Record Evidence, which is incorporated into this Resolution by reference. Section 2: Findings for California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Docusign Envelope ID: E9A23732-C360-8B77-83A5-CD57D19A7B7E