My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
_Agenda_Packet_092826
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN AND TRAILS
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2026
>
092826
>
_Agenda_Packet_092826
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2026 3:28:31 PM
Creation date
9/24/2026 3:25:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/28/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
253
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7 <br /> <br />Shared-Use Paths (Class I) <br />Shared-use paths are facilities with exclusive right-of-way for bicyclists and pedestrians <br />along a roadway or along a separate alignment from the road, and with minimized <br />crossings by vehicle traffic. These facilities support both recreational and commuting trips, <br />especially along rivers, creeks, and channels. <br /> <br />Guidance <br />• Use on roadways with above 6,000 motor vehicles/day and motor vehicle speeds <br />exceeding 30 mph. <br />• Recommended widths vary based on the user types, anticipated volumes, and <br />context, but should generally be 12 feet wide with 3-foot shoulders on each side. <br />The minimum width is 10 feet. See Caltrans DIB-94 and the AASHTO Bike Guide for <br />more guidance on facility widths. <br />• Shared-use paths may be desirable along high-volume or high-speed roadways, <br />where accommodating the targeted type of bicyclist within the roadway in a safe <br />and comfortable way is impractical. <br />• Maximum grade should not exceed 5 percent. There may be certain places where <br />physical constraints prevent compliance with the 5 percent maximum grade, in <br />which case mitigations such as providing additional path width for slower bicyclists <br />to dismount and walk, providing resting intervals with flatter grades, or providing <br />pedestrian handrails should be considered.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.