My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
_Agenda_Packet_092826
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN AND TRAILS
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2026
>
092826
>
_Agenda_Packet_092826
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2026 3:28:31 PM
Creation date
9/24/2026 3:25:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/28/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
253
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
9 <br /> <br />minimizing the number of driveway and street crossings present along a path and <br />otherwise providing high-visibility crossing treatments. <br />• Path clearances are an important element in path design and reducing user <br />conflicts. Vertical objects should be set back at least two feet from the edge of the <br />path. Path shoulders may also reduce conflicts by providing space for users who <br />step off the path to rest, allowing users to pass one another, or providing space for <br />viewpoints. <br />• Trails on grades greater than 3 to 5 percent should be wider to account for higher <br />bicycle speed in the downhill direction and additional space for faster bicyclists to <br />pass slower bicyclists and pedestrians in the uphill direction. <br />• Consider providing amenities such as restrooms, bike racks, and portable water at <br />trailheads, and covered rest stops along the trail to ensure that paths are welcoming <br />to a variety of user types, including families with children and seniors. <br />• Consider providing maps and signs to improve wayfinding for users, such as signs <br />that show trail names, connections to nearby trails, and/or nearby destinations. <br />• Bollards within the clear width of shared-use paths are generally discouraged due to <br />increased crash risk and potential delays to emergency response. Instead, prioritize <br />regulatory signage, clear visual cues indicating the facility is not intended for motor <br />vehicle use, and entry designs that discourage vehicle access without introducing <br />fixed obstacles. Where physical measures are necessary, use markings and <br />geometric design elements, such as narrowed or split path entries, to deter vehicle <br />intrusion while maintaining a clear, predictable path for shared-use path users. <br />• Center line striping is optional on shared-use paths and should be used to help <br />separate opposing travel directions. This should be applied continuously or at <br />targeted locations, such as curves with limited sight distance, unlit segments where <br />nighttime use is expected, approaches to intersections, or near centerline <br />obstructions like bollards. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.