Laserfiche WebLink
50 <br /> <br />• 10’ travel lanes are not recommended on 4-lane undivided arterial roadways but <br />may be considered where speeds are 30 mph or less and truck use is low. <br />Considerations <br />• Narrowing existing motor vehicle lanes may result in enough space to create <br />separated bicycle lanes, widened sidewalks and buffers, or a combination of on- <br />street bike lanes and enhancements to the pedestrian corridor. <br />• Narrower lanes can contribute to lower operating speeds along the roadway, which <br />may be appropriate in dense, walkable corridors. <br />• Caution should be taken when considering reducing travel lanes on roadways where <br />there are multiple turn lanes onto the roadway. <br />• Lane widths below 11 ft on multilane urban/suburban arterials are commonly <br />supported in the literature at ≤35–45 mph, often showing no meaningful crash <br />penalty and sometimes safety benefits via lower speeds—but they can <br />create operational and risk-management drawbacks where speeds are higher, <br />truck/bus volumes are higher, lateral clearance is constrained, or where side-swipe <br />/ lane-departure risk is elevated. <br />Lane Reconfiguration <br />Lane reconfiguration involves reducing the total number of travel lanes on a corridor to <br />improve safety and provide space for bicycle lanes, turn lanes, streetscapes, wider <br />sidewalks, and other purposes. Lane reconfiguration may be used in conjunction with <br />treatments that reduce crossing distance, such as curb extensions, median refuges, and <br />protected intersections. Lane reconfiguration can take many forms; an example of a four- <br />to-three lane reconfiguration is shown below. In all cases, a traffic analysis is needed to <br />determine feasibility. <br />