Laserfiche WebLink
�) Page 3 <br />1995 Cal. PUC LEXIS 795, *; 61 CPUC2d 643 <br />11. Since no facilities are to be constructed, it can be seen with certainty that the proposed operation will not have a <br />significant effect upon the environment. <br />12. The Commission has routinely granted NDIECs, such as applicant, an exemption from Rule 18(b) to the extent <br />that the rule requires applicant to serve a copy of its application on cities and counties in the proposed service area and <br />to the extent that it requires applicant to provide a conformed copy of all exhibits attached to applicant's filed <br />application to potential competitors. <br />13. Exemption from the provisions of PU Code § § 816-830 has been granted to other resellers. (See, e.g., D.86- <br />10-007 and D.88-12-076.) <br />Conclusions of Law <br />1. Applicant has the financial ability to provide the proposed service. <br />2. Applicant has made a reasonable showing of technical expertise in telecommunications. <br />3. Public convenience and necessity require the interLATA and intraLATA services to be offered by applicant. <br />4. Applicant is subject to: <br />a. The current 3.0% surcharge applicable to service rates of intraLATA toll and intrastate [*7] <br />interLATA toll to fund the Universal Lifeline Telephone Service (PU Code § 879; D.94-09-065); <br />b. The current 0.3% surcharge on gross intrastate interLATA revenues to fund the California Relay <br />Service and communications devices fund (PU Code § 2881; Resolution T-15254); <br />c. The user fee provided in PU Code § § 431-435, which is 0.1% of gross intrastate revenue for the <br />1995-96 fiscal year (Resolution M-4777); and, <br />d. The California High Cost Fund fee of 0.5% (D.94-09-065). <br />5. Applicant should be exempted from Rule 18(b)'s requirement of service of the application on cities and counties <br />in the proposed service area and service of all exhibits attached to this application on potential competitors. <br />6. The application should be granted to the extent set forth below. <br />7. Because of the public interest in competitive interLATA and intraLATA services, the following order should be <br />effective immediately. <br />ORDER <br />IT IS ORDERED that: <br />1. A certificate of public convenience and necessity is granted to IXC Long Distance, Inc. (applicant) to operate as <br />a reseller of the interLocal Access and Transport Area (LATA) and, to the extent authorized by Decision (D.) 94-09- <br />065, intraLATA [*8] telecommunication services offered by communication common carriers in California. <br />2. Applicant shall file a written acceptance of the certificate granted in this proceeding. <br />3. a. Applicant is authorized to file with this Commission tariff schedules for the provision of interLATA and <br />intraLATA service. Applicant may not offer interLATA and/or intraLATA service until tariffs are on file. Applicant's <br />initial filing shall be made in accordance with General Order (GO) 96-A, excluding Sections IV, V, and VI, and shall be <br />effective not less than 1 day after filing. <br />b. Applicant is a nondominant interexchange-carrier (NDIEC). The effectiveness of its future tariffs is subject to the <br />schedules set forth in Ordering Paragraph 5 of D.90-08-032, as modified by D.91-12-013 and D.92-06-034: <br />"5. All NDIECs are hereby placed on notice that their California tariff filings will be processed in <br />accordance with the following effectiveness schedule: <br />