SR 05:031 - Laserfiche WebLink

4.0 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Yes No 4.1 Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environ- X ment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a IBh or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels~ threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal species or eliminate important examples of the maj or periods of California history or prehistory? 4.2 Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvan- X tage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the envi- ronment is one, which occurs in relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will ensure well into the future.) 4.3 Does the project have impacts, which are individually limited, but cumula- X tively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate re- sources, where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) 4.4 Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantially X adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? 5.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION I find that the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment and, thus, recommend that a Negative Declaration be issued for the proposal. I find that the mitigation measures recommended in the Initial Study for those aspects of the proposed project, which could have a significant effect would reduce the effects to insignificant levels and, thus, if such measures are included as conditions to project ap- proval, I recommend that a Negative Declaration be issued. X I find that the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment, and, thus, recommend that an Environmental Impact Report be prepared. Name D~e PUD-33, Initial Study Page l l of I l December 4, 2003