Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3909 Vineyard Avenue <br />Design Review Comments <br />October 31, 2005 Page 5 <br /> <br />. 4. Provide a bit more refined design for <br />column caps throughout the project. <br /> <br />5. Use more modest supporting brackets <br />for balcony projections, if possible. <br /> <br />6. Use exposed rafter tails throughout the <br />project. <br /> <br />7. Restudy end elevations facing internal <br />driveway to give them more of a "Front <br />Door" feel. (See diagram to the right.) <br /> <br />Include special window or <br />other interesting features <br />in this view corridor <br /> <br />Enhance visual appeal <br />in this focal point area <br />~. .. <br />~-~- "~~1~ <br />>il.". :.C, ,~..-.J'~~.~.'" ."_.=.-::J/ <br />, . -...~--- !:::III . , -I .. J <br />'f':"':'"",.--": ::-. '_'=i <br />"., ..... =F .,~''':r- <br />, .;."::".: .10" -L."o", <br />. .1 ........ ..1 ,1,-. ....... <br />.". --.-....- <br /> <br /> <br />'H n_ __ _____" <br /> <br />.~:;(~.t2~.~z~~-~t. . <br />. .;~._n'.= <br />." :2;---.-:- ~"_m_"_.:..-~ <br />_U- ~ ~ <br /> <br />Consider using siding Provide distinctive <br />in this exposed wall entries <br /> <br />Previous Elevation <br />You asked me to also evaluate the previous elevation submittal. The provided drawing was untitled, <br />but I assume that it is the Birch Creek Drive elevation. My comments are as follows: <br />L This approach has a better relationship to pedestrians by virtue of eliminating the raised first floor <br />elevation. <br /> <br />2. The variation of roofheights provide a bit more defmition of individual units than the current proposal, <br />but that delineation is still not very strong. <br /> <br />3. There are some awkward conditions of vertical stacked forms and roofforms as noted on the diagram <br />below. <br /> <br /> <br />... <br /> <br />CANNON DESIGN GROUP <br /> <br />+ <br /> <br />180 HARBORDRlVE.SUlTE 219.SAUSALITO.CA94965 <br />