My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:060
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:060
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/2/2007 4:06:08 PM
Creation date
2/15/2006 4:39:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/21/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:060
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
385
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />3909 Vineyard A venue Environmental Checklist <br /> <br />the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water <br />disposal systems where sewers are not available <br />for the disposal of waste water? <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />a-i, ii) The subject site is not located in the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone as delineated <br />by the California Division of Mines and Geology3. The project would not be subject to <br />potential damage from earthquake ground shaking as a maximum intensity of VIII of the <br />Modified Mercalli Scale. <br /> <br />The State of California provides minimum standards for building design through the <br />California Building Standards Code (California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 24). <br />The California Uniform Building Code is based on the UBC and has been modified for <br />California conditions with numerous more detailed and/or stringent regulations. Specific <br />seismic safety requirements are set forth in Chapter 23 of the UBC. The State earthquake <br />protection law requires that buildings be designed to resist stresses produced by lateral <br />forces caused by earthquakes. The City implements the requirements of the California <br />Code through its building permit process. The proposed project will be required to <br />comply with the applicable codes and standards to provide earthquake resistant design. <br />Therefore, this would be a less-than-significant-impact. <br /> <br />a-iii) A geotechnical report was prepared by Treadwell&Rollo for the proposed development. <br />The report finds that the site is suitable for the proposed project. The report finds that the <br />proposed buildings can be supported by on shallow footings bearing on native soiL <br />Alternatively, a stiffened foundation systems appropriate for the site could be used <br />Therefore, this would be less-than-significant-impact. <br /> <br />a-iv) The site is generally flat to slightly sloping and would not be subject to landslides. <br />Therefore, this would be categorized as no-impact. <br /> <br />b-d) Natural erosion is frequently accelerated by human activities such as site preparation for <br />construction and alteration of topographic features. Grading, vegetation removal, as well <br />as excavation and trenching for on-site and off-site utility lines, will disturb soils, which <br />could increase the rate of erosion if controls or best management practices are not in <br />place. The City requires that all projects meet the requirements for stormwater control <br />measures during design, construction and implementation phases of the project. Grading <br />is prohibited from October 15 to April 1 to reduce citywide impacts. Therefore, this <br />would be a less-than-significant-impact. <br /> <br />e) The project will provide public infrastructure related to storm water discharge, sewer, and <br />water service. There will not be septic systems or alternative wastewater disposal <br />systems within the project. Therefore, this would be categorized as no-impact. <br /> <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.