My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:060
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:060
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/2/2007 4:06:08 PM
Creation date
2/15/2006 4:39:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/21/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:060
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
385
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />7... WhetherJhe plan conforms to the purposes of the PUD District. <br /> <br />The proposed PUD development plan conforms to the purposes of the PUD district. One <br />of these purposes is to insure that the desires of the developer and the community are <br />understood and approved prior to commencement of construction. Staff believes that the <br />proposed project implements the purposes of the PUD ordinance in this case by providing <br />well-designed and sited high density project on this in-fill site, and that meets the City's <br />General Plan goals and policies, including those which encourage meeting the needs of <br />affordable housing. The PUD process allows for ample input from the public and for an <br />ultimate decision by the City Council regarding appropriateness of the proposed use. <br />Therefore, staff believes that this finding can be made. <br /> <br />VII. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br /> <br />A negative declaration was prepared in conjunction with the proposed planned unit development <br />plan. Based on the Initial Study and Negative Declaration, the project would not have <br />significant effect on the environment. The proposed project plans have been revised to avoid <br />significant effects or mitigated by design to a point where the effects are insignificant and there <br />is no substantial evidence that the project as revised may have a significant effect. <br /> <br />Staff has filed a Notice of Determination and a Mitigated Negative Declaration with the State <br />Clearing House. <br /> <br />VIII. CONCLUSION <br /> <br />The site is an infill site in the City that is zoned for high-density residential development. Staff <br />feels that the proposed zoning and density are appropriate for the site. Staff believes that the <br />project is attractively designed and will be compatible with the neighborhood. Both on- and off- <br />site improvements will help the project visually and functionally blend in with the existing <br />neighborhood. The project, with its affordable housing component, will provide a necessary <br />service to this community. <br /> <br />IX. STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br />Staff recommends that the Commission take the following actions: <br /> <br />1. Find that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment and that the <br />Negative Declaration is the appropriate document as shown in Exhibit C; <br /> <br />2. Find that the project has a De Minimis impact; <br /> <br />Case No. PUD-49 <br /> <br />Planning Commission <br /> <br />Page - 14 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.