|
<br />Table 2: A!'Ie Distribution, 2005
<br /> City of Pleasanton Tri-Valley ReQion (a) Bav Area lb)
<br />AQe Cohort Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent
<br />Under 15 15,104 22.4% 65,622 21.6% 1,354,256 19.5%
<br />15 to 17 3,433 5.1% 14,576 4.8% 267,526 3.9%
<br />18to 20 2,265 3.4% 10,595 3.5% 250,146 3.6%
<br />21 to 24 2,740 4.1% 13,152 4.3% 325,451 4.7%
<br />25 to 34 6.247 9.3% 31,797 10.5% 993,130 14.3%
<br />35 to 44 12,162 18.0% 53,916 17.8% 1,150,250 16.6%
<br />45 to 54 11,973 17.6% 52,821 17.4% 1,059,017 15.2%
<br />55 to 64 7.788 11.5% 35,526 11.7% 736,750 10.6%
<br />65 to 74 3,336 4.9% 15,290 5.0% 414,180 6.0%
<br />75 to 84 1,746 2.6% 7.589 2.5% 281,147 4.0%
<br />85 + 647 1.0% 2843 0.9% 113042 16%
<br />Total 67.441 100.0% 303,727 100.0% 6,944.895 100.0%
<br />Median Age 38.2 38.0 37.5
<br />
<br />Table 3: Household Income Distribution, 2005
<br /> City of Pleasanton Trl-Valley Reqlon (a) Bay Area (b)
<br />Household Income Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent
<br />Less than $15,000 741 3.0% 3,136 2.9% 210,059 8.4%
<br />$15,000 to $24,999 904 3.7% 3,629 3.4% 165,120 6.6%
<br />$25,000 to $34,999 799 3.2% 3,777 3.5% 179,130 7.2%
<br />$35,000 to $49,999 1,716 7.0% 8,028 7.4% 294,062 11.8%
<br />$50,000 to $74,999 3,681 15.0% 15,512 14.4% 445,583 17.8%
<br />$75,000 to $99,999 3,591 14.6% 16,283 15.1% 354,383 14.2%
<br />$100,000 to $149,999 6,025 24.5% 26,466 24.5% 451,190 18.0%
<br />$150,000 to $249,999 4,730 19.2% 20,770 19.2% 274,834 11.0%
<br />$250,000 to $499,999 1,651 6.7% 7,109 6.6% 83,431 3.3%
<br />$500,000 and over 765 3.1% 3369 3.1% 43.467 1.7%
<br />Total 24,603 100.0% 108,079 100.0% 2,501,259 100.0%
<br />Median Household Income $107,219 $106.943 $72,569
<br />
<br />Notes: (a) The Tri-Valley Region includes Alamo, Blackhawk, Danville, Dublin, livermore, Pleasanton, San Ramon and
<br />Suno!.
<br />(b) The Bay Area defined as the nine county region.
<br />Sources: Claritas, Inc., Bay Area Economics, 2005.
<br />
<br />Pleasanton Economic Development Background Report
<br />RNAL - January 2006
<br />
<br />8
<br />
|