My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 020905
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
PC 020905
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 3:19:49 PM
Creation date
3/9/2006 9:04:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/9/2005
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 020905
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
5. Adopt a resolution recommending approval of PUD-42 subject to the drag <br />conditions o£ approval and any additional conditions o£ approval as determined by <br />the Commission. <br />Commissioner Fox believed that any action with respect to deleting the sidewalk should <br />go to the Parks and Recreation Commission. <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Fox whether this sidewalk appeared on the <br />trails map, Mr. Pavan replied that this sidewalk did not meet any of the criteria for <br />inclusion on the trails map. <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Fox regarding the presence of a trail or a <br />sidewalk on a private road, Ms. Nerland replied that the private road would not need to be <br />converted to a public road. She added that the public easement has been dedicated to the <br />City on both side o£ the Bozorgzad and Bach-Lamb properties, which is true o£ other <br />sidewalks and easements throughout the City; it would not affect the public street nature <br />of the vehicular road. <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Fox regarding the ability of the police to <br />patrol a private pathway going through public land, Ms. Nerland replied that part of the <br />review process for an application includes a review by the Staff Review Board, which <br />includes a representative of the Police Department. She added that the Police <br />representative is involved in projects on a regular basis and would have familiarity with <br />such issues. <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Fox regarding the grade change, Mr. Pavan <br />replied that this item was looked at by Jeff Bretzing, the City's Senior Code Enforcement <br />Officer and a sergeant with the Police Department. He noted that planning safety with <br />respect to police enforcement and monitoring issues is an important component in the <br />review process. He added that the stairs can be seen from San Carlos Way, and the rest <br />o£ the pathway may be seen from the end o£ Sycamore Terrace. He added that a <br />discussion had taken place with Jim Wolf, the City's Parks and Community Services <br />Director, with respect to similar situations; to the best of Mr- Wolfs knowledge, there <br />had been no complaints or concerns received about nefarious activity near the sports <br />Pai'k- <br />Commissioner Fox expressed concern about multiple police calls with respect to the <br />elevated stairs near Mission Park, which was not visible from the street. She believed <br />this should be examined in detail. <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Blank regarding the sidewalk, Mr. Pavan <br />confirmed that the surface of the sidewalk would be hush with the surface of the private <br />street- <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES February 9, 2005 Page 1 1 of 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.