PC 020905 - Laserfiche WebLink

be surveyed by a civil engineer or a licensed land surveyor; all existing features, property lines, and fences would be verified based upon the survey done in the field- Any resulting discrepancy between the fence location and the line location must be resolved in conjunction with the map. Ms_ Nerland wished to clarify that the City cannot force Lhe Greener to give up some o£ their property through clot-line adj ustment_ The survey and parcel map process will determine the lot line, and if the Bozorgzads, Lambs, and Greener decide on a mutual shifting o£that line, the City would process that lot-line adjustment- In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Roberts regarding the storm water runoff as it concerned the Greener, Mr_ Jost replied that the concrete V-ditch would terminate at Sycamore Creek, and would go through any controls required by Fish 8c Game or other environmental agencies- He added that Sycamore Creek was part o£ the storm drain- In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Roberts whether solid fences were allowed on the hill, Mr_ Pavan replied that open fencing would be placed at the property line at the request o£the Greener; the solid fencing would be allowed along the side property lines_ Commissioner Roberts requested that the solid fencing be changed because it was going up a hill. THE PUBLIC HEAI2ING WAS OPENED- Ed Lamb, Jr_ 446 Sycamore Road, applicant, noted that he plar~ned to build a home for his family on one o£the subdivided lots and that his father planned to do the same- He acknowledged that the pathway had been a major issue from the beginning, and he wished to clarify that he did not apply for the amendment to remove the sidewalk. After speaking with the neighbors, he believed that they had good reasons to warrant consideration of its removal He noted that they were not requesting any variances on the project and. deliberately stayed within the standards of the North Sycamore Specific Plan; they also made some concessions to the neighbors with respect to additional setbacks, fencework, and lower elevations of some of the homes. He asked the Commission to provide some objective feedback and guidance regarding the outstanding, unresolved issues. In response to Commissioner Blank's question regarding the connection of the northern part of the trail to the existing southern portion, Mr. Lamb stated. that the connection. went over what would be their and their neighbor's private driveway. There will not be a sidewalk on the private driveway- In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Blank whether the path would cross all three of the driveways, Mr_ Lamb replied that the shortest point to the southern section of the sidewalk would be largely in front of the entrance to the Bozorgzads' home- The driveway would be a shared private driveway- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES February 9, 2005 Page 13 of 22