My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 020905
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
PC 020905
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 3:19:49 PM
Creation date
3/9/2006 9:04:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/9/2005
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 020905
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The Planning Commission recessed for a break at IUc26 p.m. <br />Commissioner Roberts reconvened the meeting at 10c32 p.m. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS RE-OPENED_ <br />Hoss Bozorgzad clariF ed the placement of the pathway in relation to his house as <br />discussed by the Commission and identified the public trail easement. He reiterated his <br />concern over the patrolability of the trail. <br />Ms. Nerland noted that the CJity had a recorded agreement between the Bozorgzads and <br />the Bachs, drafted by Mr. McDonald, dealing with the roadway and easement issues, and <br />the resulting payments. <br />Mr. Bozorgzad recalled the history of the design o£ the pedestrian pathway and his work <br />with his engineers and the City planners. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />The Commission examined the site map and engaged in further discussion on the details <br />of the site. <br />Commissioner Fox moved to recommend approval of Case PSP-08 to delete the <br />pedestrian sidewalk from the PUD development plan. <br />Commissioner Roberts seconded the motion. <br />Commissioner Roberts did not believe this pathway was meant to be a trail and that it <br />was more appropriate to serve as acut-through. She believed this pathway would create <br />hazards. <br />Commissioner Fox did not believe the pathway met the Police Department's definition of <br />a sidewalk. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE. <br />AYES= Commissioners Blank, Fox, and Roberts. <br />NOES= None. <br />ABSTAIN= None. <br />RECUSED: None. <br />ABSENT= Commissioners Arkin and Maas. <br />Resolution No. PC-2005-07 was entered and adopted as motioned. <br />Commissioner Roberts believed that the issues of cost-sharing should be discussed <br />between the applicants and the City Attorney's Office. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES February 9, 2005 Page 18 of 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.