Laserfiche WebLink
Chapter 4: Analysis of Current Funding of the Continuum <br />• North County. The highest concentration of North County's $13,542,195 in homeless <br />funds fell in the Support category of the Continuum (approximately $5,200,000). The <br />Emergency category also received a high level of funding ($4,500,000), as did the - <br />Permanent category with $3,000,000 (Shelter Plus Care funds). On the other hand, the <br />areas of Prevention, Outreach, Transition and Planning/ Administration received very little <br />funding (Chart 6). - <br />• Mid County. The vast majority of the $2,483,547 in homeless expenditures were spent on <br />Emergency services (approximately $1,400,000}. The Permanent category represented -' <br />nearly $500,000 in funds, while Support and Transition accounted for approximately <br />$200,000 and $300,000, respectively. Prevention (eviction prevention subsidies) <br />accounted for $49,000. Very little funding was allocated to Planning/Administration, - <br />while none was directed towards Outreach (Chart 7). <br />• South County. Funds in the South County area totaled $1,684,663 and fell within the <br />categories of Emergency ($460,000), Support ($299,000), Transition ($517,000), and <br />Permanent ($410,000). The categories of Prevention, Outreach and __ <br />Planning/Administration received no funds for homeless services {Chart 8). <br />• East County. Like the South County area, East County (totaling $979,341) had no funds - <br />within the Prevention, Outreach and Planning/ Administration categories. The majority of <br />expenditures flow into the Transition category ($367,000), followed by Emergency <br />($342,000), then Permanent and Support ($196,000 and $74,000, respectively) (Chart 9). - <br />Alameda County-Wide Homeless Continuum of Care Plan: April 1997 - <br />54 <br />