My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 96088
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
RES 96088
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2012 8:32:17 AM
Creation date
2/24/1999 6:49:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
8/6/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
161
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
analyze street width and curbing requirements, <br /> circulation improvements (such as traffic light <br /> dedication requirements), etc. <br /> <br /> · The discussion of fees and exactions should <br /> itemiz___ e all developer and planning fees, including <br /> those for school impact, streets, lighting, etc. <br /> <br /> · The element does not contain an analysis of <br /> pleasanton's procedures for processing.development <br /> applications. The analysis of processing <br /> procedures should describe and analyze typical <br /> processing and approval procedures for various <br /> types of zoning and development applications, <br /> including procedures when a discretionary permit <br /> is required- <br /> If any constraint is identified, the City should include <br /> program actio~ m ~move or miXgate, whe~ legal~ possible, govemmen~l <br /> co~ain~ m me maintenance, improveme~, or developmem of housing <br /> (Section 65583(c) (3). <br /> <br />2. ~clude an invento~ of ~nd suitable for residential d~elopment, including <br /> vacant sites and sites having potenaal for redevelopment, and an analsis od <br /> me rel~io~h~ of zoning and public facilities and se~ices available to ~ese <br /> si~s (Section 65583 (a)(3)). <br /> According to the housing element, after subtracting <br /> newly built units, by income category, pleasanton's <br /> remaining regional share need is 764 units, 102 low- <br /> and 662 very low-income units. The City states in the <br /> element that "the City has zoned more than enough <br /> residential land at appropriate densities to meet and <br /> exceed its aggregate share of regional needs as <br /> determined by ABAG'." To substantiate this conclusion <br /> the following changes should be made to Table IV-13: <br /> · The table contains general plan land use <br /> designations, it should also contain the current <br /> zc:~.ing, or the anticipated zoning for the parcels <br /> ncz currently within the pleasanton city limits <br /> and the anticipated acreage for parcels undergoing <br /> annexation. <br /> <br /> · Mr. RasT'~ssen has informed us that annexation is <br /> underwa'= for some of the parcels identified in <br /> Table IV-13. The element should clarify the <br /> status of the annexation applications, including <br /> timelines for completion. The element should <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.