My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 96088
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
RES 96088
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2012 8:32:17 AM
Creation date
2/24/1999 6:49:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
8/6/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
161
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
17.36.010 <br /> <br />1990's has left appmvcd projects residential development this Chapter's <br />unbuiit in the time frames contemplat- key new elements are to better accom- <br />ed. And, because the Growth Manage- roodate residential projects desiring to <br />ment Program Ordinance was not de- build in the short-term and to avoid the <br />signed to regulate when units were built creation of a backlog of approved, bul <br />after a final n~p was secured for a unbuilt, units in the rumre. (Ord. 1614 <br />project, many more units than the maxi- § 2, 1993) <br />mum growth rate established in the <br />General Plan are currently eligible to be <br />constructed in the short-term. If built in 17.36.020 Objectives- <br />another rapid construction'cycle, the The protection of the public health, <br />residents occupying these new units safety, and general welfare requires a <br />could create stress on the City's infra- growth management proSTam to accom- <br />structure, the school dismct's ability to plish the following: <br />provide adequate facilities, and the A. Regulate the timing, location, and <br />city's provision of services - all to the type of residential gTowth in accordance <br />detriment of the quality of life enjoyed with the goals and policies of the Gen- <br />by City residents and workers. eral Plan. <br />E. The City Council has worked with B. Retain flexibility to accommodate <br />the development community to develop projects desiring and capable of actual <br />a voluntary prodTam to minimiT~ the development in the short-term in order <br />potential negative effects which could to more closely meet yearly develop- <br />be caused by the rapid development of ment goals- <br />the backlog of approved projects. This C. Allow re-evaluation of develop- <br />program, the *Modified Gwwth Man- ment phasing of projects which do not <br />agemeat Program*, leaves the regula- pwcced to actual development in accor- <br />tions of the then-existing Grovah Man- dance with originally proposed sched- <br />agement Program Ordinance in effect ules. <br />for all projects which received City D. Facilitate and implement the <br />Council growth management approval General Plan goals, including the goals <br />prior to 1993, but for those developers of the housing element, which cannot <br />participating in the *Modified Pro- be accomplished bY zoning alone. <br />gram*, it modifies by mutual a~r~ement E. Provide significant incentives to <br />the timing as to when these units may developers to provide subsidized hous- <br />bc built. To intclgratc new Igro's'th man- ing or provide financial assistance to <br />agemerit approvals with the *Modified accompUsh this goal. <br />program*, the Growth Management F. Encourage developers to propose <br />ProSTam is being comprehcnsivcly housing which meets needs identified <br />revised in this Chapter. In addition to by the Council as priority housing <br />maintaining the former ordinancc*s con- types, particularly lower-income pro- <br />trol over the tifftinS and type of new jects. <br /> <br /> 461 0,1usuto~ S-~4) <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.