My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 96088
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
RES 96088
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2012 8:32:17 AM
Creation date
2/24/1999 6:49:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
8/6/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
161
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Program 18.1: Zone inffil areas at densities compatible with <br /> infrastructure capacityiiii!~!~~ii~i~i!i~i!,~i~~. <br /> <br /> Responsible Agency: t,,.__:_~ n ....... ~j~ <br /> <br /> Time Period: , nan , na~ ~i~ <br /> <br /> Funding Source: Planning Department Budget <br /> <br />1996 EVALUATION: Objective met. Continue Program. Since 1991, the City has constructed <br />more than 1,100 homes on parcels which could be considered infill locations. <br /> <br /> Program 18.2: Allow "grr..'lr.y nat;" <br /> ~iiiii~d....:iiii~iiiii~:~....:.~iiiiii~iiii~~ in all R-1 zoning districts to <br /> increase the number of housing units while preserving the visual <br /> character within existing neighborhoods of single-family detached <br /> homes. <br /> <br /> Responsible Agency: Planning Department <br /> Time Period: Ongoing <br /> Funding Source: Planning Department Budget <br /> <br />1996 EVALUATION: Objective met. Continue program. This program was recommended <br />to be expanded by the Tri-Valley Subregional Planning Strategy. Since 1990, the City has <br />received only several applications for "second units." This is undoubtedly due to the large <br />amount of construction on vacant land. As large tracts of land become increasingly scarce, the <br />City anticipates a greater demand for infill projects such as second units. Therefore, the <br />program should be kept in place for the future. <br /> <br />1996 EVALUATION: This program was recommended to be added by the Tri-Valley <br />Subregional Planning Strategy. <br /> <br /> 23 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.