My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 95024X
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
RES 95024X
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2012 11:10:33 AM
Creation date
2/25/1999 5:48:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/21/1995
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
335
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Financial Plan <br /> <br /> 2. The extent to which commercial-generated traffic contributes to peak-hour conges- <br /> tion. For example, AM peak-hour traffic generated by retail development generally <br />- occurs after the wOrk-trip commute peak hour. <br /> <br /> These fees are illustrative of the level of impact fees required but are not meant to be <br />- final calculations. The TVTC must go beyond this plan to develop an impact fee <br /> program that would establish a legal nexus between development levels and fees <br /> charged and also clarify many ancillary issues. At a minimum, the program needs to <br /> consider the following issues: <br /> <br /> · Land Use Categories. Will there be one fee for all residential development or will <br /> it vary with density? Similarly, how many commercial categories will be used? <br />' Jurisdictions typically use three categories: retail, industrial, and office. Would <br /> even more categories be useful? <br /> <br />"' · Credits. Should certain projects that have already contributed regional improve- <br /> ments, such as Hacienda Business Park, be entitled to a fee credit? <br /> <br />' · Exemptions. Should certain project with significant social value, such as low- <br /> income housing, be exempt from fees? What about projects that significantly <br /> enhance the area's economic development? <br /> <br /> · Fee Collection. How and by whom should the fees be collected? Who will bank the <br /> funds and contract for transportation projects? <br /> <br /> · Transfer of Funds Between Jurisdictions. A subregional fee collected among the <br /> seven jurisdictions of Tri-Valley could potentially result in a situation where funds <br />- collected in one jurisdiction were expended on the construction of regional projects <br /> in another jurisdiction. The concept of a subregional fee for the Tri-Valley will <br /> need to address the acceptability and magnitude of cross-jurisdictional transfers of <br />._ fee revenues. TVTC has established that it does not wish for any regional fee <br /> revenues collected in Tri-Valley to be expended on projects outside of the Tri- <br /> Valley subarea. <br /> <br /> · Relationship to Future Countywide or Regionwide Fee Programs. If in the future, a <br /> countywide or regionwide (nine-county Bay Area) fee program is established, the <br /> relationship of those programs to the Tri-Valley regional fee will need to be <br />' addressed, especially with regard to crediting an in-place Td-Valley fee toward a <br /> countywide fee. <br /> <br />' · Impact of the Fee on Growth. Fee levels that are too high for either residential or <br /> nonresidential development may adversely affect the efforts of TVTC jurisdictions <br /> to promote economic growth or affordable housing opportunities. To address the <br /> concerns, the TVTC will seek the assistance of the Association of Bay Area <br /> Governments to evaluate the economic impacts of a regional transportation impact <br /> fee on economic and residential growth in the Tri Valley area. <br /> <br />" Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. 154 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.