Laserfiche WebLink
Recommended Improvement Plan <br /> <br /> The plan is based on a more-achievable goal of an average 10 percent increase in AVR <br /> for all employers. This increase would be realized through the adoption and enforce- <br /> merit of local trip reduction ordinances. The 10 percent increase in AVR will bring <br /> some of the intersections otherwise projected to be borderline unacceptable back into <br /> compliance with the TSOs. <br /> <br /> Road Improvement Plan <br /> <br /> The Tri-Valley Transportation Plan includes many road improvement projects. These <br /> projects were developed by the member jurisdictions of the TVTC. Projects range from <br /> intersection modlt~cations to freeway improvements and new roads. The resulting <br /> system would provide good circulation within the Tri-Valley area. Figure 7-1 shows the <br /> pl_~nned roadway system. Figure 5-2 in Chapter 5 shows the planned changes to <br /> freeway interchanges. Details on planned intersection lane configurations are included <br /> in the Technical Appendix. A detailed listing of the planned roadway improvements is <br /> shown in Table 7-1. <br /> <br /> Critical Regional Projects <br /> <br /> Since most arterial improvements and extensions are local-serving and will be paid for <br /> by new development, the financial plan needs to focus on the funding of the larger <br /> projects with regional significance. The TVTC developed the following list of criteria to <br /> define projects for inclusion in a potential regional impact fee program: <br /> <br /> 1. The project must involve a route of regional significance as defmed by the TVTC <br /> for the transportation plan (see Figure 1-1). <br /> <br /> 2. Transit projects can be included. <br /> <br /> 3. The project must be identified in an adopted plan. <br /> <br /> 4. The project would not be built as a direct developer improvement. <br /> <br /> While not a part of the originally adopted list, a fifth criterion discussed by the TVTC <br /> is that the project sho~.d serve more than one jurisdiction. <br /> <br /> By these criteria, the following planned projects would qualify as being regionally <br /> signH~cant. These have been preliminarily determined to be of highest priority for <br /> funding due to their demonstrated need in meeting the TSOs through 2010. This list <br /> may be modified in subsequent studies. <br /> <br /> 1. 1-580/1-680 Interchange. Southbound-to-eastbound flyover. <br /> <br />Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. 133 <br /> <br /> <br />