Laserfiche WebLink
Rnandal Plan <br /> <br /> · Protection of the Fee's Revenue-Generating Potential During the development of <br /> the Plan, rn~.ior development proposals in the Tri Valley have been approved and <br /> their ability to generate revenues for regional transportation projects has been <br /> lost. Further erosion of the revenue-generating potential of the fee program may <br /> continue as details on the fee progrnm are resolved. TVTC encourages local <br /> jurisdictions to condition any development approval with participation in a <br /> regionnl transportation impact fee program, contingent on the eventual agreement <br /> by Tri Valley iurisdictions on a fee program, Following adoption of this plan, <br /> TVTC will consider the fee study as it highest priority. TVTC will pursue comple- <br /> tion of the fee study within 12 months. <br /> <br /> Spatial Distribution of Fees and Benefits <br /> <br /> Elected officials are concerned about where impact fees are collected and where they <br /> are spent. Table 8-5 shows the 2010 estimated peak-hour usage pattern for each of the <br /> high-priority projects. Each jurisdiction would benefit from two or more of the regional <br /> projects. <br /> <br /> Table 8-5 <br /> Traffic Pattern on High-Priority Regional Projects <br /> <br /> 2010 Traffic Origin <br /> <br /> San Uninc. <br /> Project Danville Ramon CCC Dublin Pleasanton Livermore Through <br /> <br /> 1-580/I-680 Interchange 6% 6% 6% 20% 34% 14% 14% <br /> <br /> Route 84 1% 1% 2% 9% 10% 49% 28% <br /> 1-680 Auxiliary Lanes 23% 22% 16% 10% 10% 4% 15% <br /> BART Extension 2% 5% 6% 14% 16% 22% 34% <br /> 1-580 HOV Lanes 0% 6% 3% 15% 15% 39% 28% <br /> 1-680 HOV Lanes 3% 4% 5% 13% 30% 27% 19% <br /> 1-680/Alcosta 0% 38% 28% 28% 2~/o [P/o 0% <br /> 1-580/Foothill 2% 6% 12% 43% 31% 6~/~ 0% <br /> Crow Canyon Safety 36% 31% 9% 3% 2% 0% 19% <br /> Vasco Safety 1% 1% 10% 9% 12% 44% 23% <br /> <br />Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. 156 <br /> <br /> <br />