My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 95097
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
RES 95097
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2012 1:55:52 PM
Creation date
2/26/1999 4:46:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
8/15/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Action Plan <br /> <br /> Even with implementation of the expected land use and network assumptions set forth in <br /> Chapter 5, the following and other TSO violations are forecast to occur: <br /> <br /> Intersection V/C LOS <br /> <br /> Dougherty Road and Dublin Boulevard 0.93 E <br /> Tassajara Road and Dublin Boulevard 1.05 F <br /> Fallon Road and Dublin Boulevard 1.12 F <br /> Isabel and Jack London 0.95 E <br /> Isabel and North Canyons Parkway 0.92 E <br /> Santa Rita Road and 1-580 EB Off-Ramp 0,94 E <br /> Alcosta Boulevard and Bollinger Canyon Road 1.06 F <br /> Dougherty Road and Crow Canyon Road 0,98 E <br /> Dougherty Road and Bollinger Canyon Road 1.11 F <br /> Blackhawk/Crow Canyon and Camino Tassajara 1.15 F <br /> Danville Boulevard and Stone Valley Road 1.08 F <br /> <br /> Jurisdictions in Tri-Valley may implement a proactive Growth and Congestion Manage- <br /> ment strategy once a detailed growth management study has been conducted. The study <br /> should indicate the development reductions, land use density reductions, or other types of <br /> growth management/control that would be required for each applicable Tri-Valley <br /> jurisdiction in order to achieve TSO standards. Any development reduction should be <br /> proportional to the traffic distribution pcrcc=t-"-~cc for each jurisdiction. Any development <br /> reductions should be considered for their equitable effect on the development potential of <br /> the participating iurisdictions. Reductions should not create a "race" to develop, and if <br /> adopted, shall insure that iurisdictions with relatively greater development potential do <br /> not bear the full brunt of the development reductions. Also, the impact of this develop- <br /> ment reduction to traffic impact fees should be analyzed~ other alternatives such as toll <br /> road may also be analyzed. All jurisdictions will then review this information and know <br /> exactly how much reduction in development or growth management/control is needed to <br /> meet the TSOs. The growth management study and any ironact fees would each have to <br /> be approved unanimously. Violations or prO. iected violations of TSO standards remaining <br /> after a growth management strategy is adopted shall be resolved as discussed on page 237 <br /> of the Plan. <br /> <br />Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. 232 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.