Laserfiche WebLink
Plan Implementation, Monitoring, and Review <br /> <br /> Objectives could still be met. If further transportation improvements are necessary <br /> beyond what are in the TVTP, the jurisdiction should specify how they will be funded. <br /> <br /> The Action Plans for Routes of Regional Significance will be based upon adopted <br /> General Plan land uses, the existing road network, and planned improvements to the <br /> network. Consistency with the Action Plans must be established for any changes to the <br /> General Plan that may significantly reduce the ability of the facility to meet the <br /> Trifle Service Objectives. The Regional Committee will be responsible for establishing <br /> the type and size of ~mendment that will require review by the Regional Committee <br /> and the process for implementing this review. Approval of a General Plan Amendment <br /> found to be inconsistent with the adopted Action Plans may render the jurisdiction <br />-- ineligible for Local Street Maintenance Improvement Funds from the CCTA. <br /> <br /> Consistency with the Action Plans can be achieved by revising the proposed amend- <br /> ment, adopting local actions to offset impacts to the Route of' Regional Significance, or <br /> Council or Board denial of the ~menament. <br /> <br /> Growth Management Tools. The TVTP is not intended to be a land use control <br /> doc, ment. While the plan is based on a set of growth ass-mptions, the plan should not <br /> be interpreted as limiting growth to the ass-reed levels. xv .... .~x,^~^.~ ~^ _~n_ ~^. <br /> <br /> ,~4.^, f't~.,-_41,, 1, ..... A _,'I.,,~ ..; ...... .,_^,.-1 't,^_^.; ............. ,;'A,,A J~l,^ rT~Qf'l ...... ~- <br /> .............. J ............. - ....~ ........ J .... 1" .................... <br /> <br /> If there are TSO violations, or projected TSO violations, in a Tri-Valley jurisdiction, <br /> then that jurisdiction can either (a) implement trnn-~portation improvements (e.g., road <br /> widening) to correct the TSO deficiency on that affected network segment, or (b) <br /> implement other measures intended to result in measurable improvements to TSOs on <br /> the Routes of Regional Significance network and contribute to significant <br /> improvements in air quality. Failing this, the jurisdiction can refer the problem to the <br /> TVTC for joint resolution. In the event that the TVTC cnnnot resolve the violation to <br /> the mutual satisfaction of all members, the jurisdiction may modify the TSO standard, <br /> but only if other jurisdictions are not physically impacted. <br /> <br /> The tools and procedures for conducting General Plan updates in Contra Costa County <br /> and analyzing proposed General Plan nmenaments will be the s~me as those used in <br /> preparing the Growth Management Elements as stated in the CCTA Growth Manage- <br /> ment Implementation Doc-ments~ page IG-52. If the specific project or policy changes <br /> are large enough to meet requirements established by the region in its adopted Action <br /> Plan, the jurisdiction considering the Plan nmenament must submit the ~rnenc]ment to <br /> the Regional Committee for evaluation of its impact on the ability to achieve Action <br /> Plan objectives. The Growth Management Program directs the RTPs to evaluate <br /> proposed nmenaments only in relation to issues affecting Action Plan success and <br /> consistency. It will be the responsibility of the jurisdiction considering the ~menament <br /> to either: <br /> <br /> 1. Demonstrate that the nmenament will not violate Action Plan policies or the <br /> ability to meet Action Plan Tr~mc Service Objectives; or <br /> <br /> Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. 237 <br /> <br /> <br />