Laserfiche WebLink
PLEASANTON SALES TAX <br /> {909) 861-4335December Receiots for July - Seot. 1993 Sales <br /> This Quarter <br /> . Sales Tax By Major Business Group <br /> J~e t~ou~ Sep~m~r we~ 13% <br /> lower th~ ~e s~e q~er one ye~ ~ <br /> ago. ~e ~p w~ ca~ed by a series <br /> of factors impacting Pleasanton's Gm~ ~-~ <br /> strong "business-t~business" sales ~"~ ~- <br /> b~e. ~ese included a s~te ch~ge in ~' <br /> the"pointofsale'foramajorcomput- ~l- <br /> ing iB en~e C~ifo~a sales ~ to ~e ~' sn ~' <br /> ciW, ~loca~on of ~ ele~mc p~ <br /> center ~d ~ educafio~ comput~ ~um~I~ ~- <br /> sales office to offier counties, ~d ~- ,~z ~. <br /> a negative acco~g Mj~ent for a ~- <br /> major me~cal s~plier. ~. ~.~ <br /> The above losses represented a ~~-~ ~' <br /> $465,000 reduction ~m ~e cornpro- ~ ' ''~ ~- <br /> ble 1992 q~er ~d offset ~e ga~ ~' <br /> ~om a s~ong recov~ in ~es of new s~m ~ Hm ~ <br /> cm, l~ber~l~g ~te~s, ~d ~. ,~ ~- <br /> con~ctor ~ppHes. D~ent store <br /> ~d app~el ~es re~ed s~ble, ~d <br /> new ad~tio~ helped ~oduce ~c~E- <br /> es in ~e li~t ~d~ ~d ~ecial~ <br /> retail cl~si~cafio~. Oval rescu- <br /> er s~es we~ sli~y do~ ~d ~e [oonomio O tlook 99 95 <br /> recent r~e~ of s~ ~ on ce~ <br /> categories of food pmducB reduced ~ou~i~c con~o~ll v~ ~t job lo~es ~om ~e &fete <br /> ~ receipB ~om ~keB ~d food ~ong in~d~ j~s~c~o~, ~e ~~d~jor~~gmoffi- <br /> stores. O~er major ~ffe~nces we~ ove~l pic~ for C~ifo~a suggesB er ~d~es pl~ a lag ~ new con- <br /> pfim~ly due to one-t~e r~oning ~t a contrive ~pmach to pro- s~c~on s~ps ~ ~ e~d to <br /> abe~tio~. jectmg s~es ~ revenues would con- res~ct ~e recove~ n~ ~ modest <br /> ~ue ~ be app~ate for 1994-95. levels. <br /> Most econo~sB a~e ~t 1994 ~11 ~e S~ Fmcisco Bay ~a ~d <br /> Revenue Companion: be a ~i~on pe~ ~ ~e econo- No~em C~ifo~a ~ e~ed to <br /> 1992-93 1993-94 my bo~m~g out ~ ~d or late ye~. follow ~e Cen~ V~ey .~ ~ ~e <br /> To Da~ To Dam However, offiy the Cen~ Valley, recove~ M~ Los ~gel~ Co~ <br /> Point-of-Sai~ $5,433,472 $4,679,2~ w~ch h~ b~efited ~om improved ~d Sou~em Califo~a's ~d Em- <br /> co~W P~i 5616,105 $581219 a~cul~e ~d new developmen~ is p~e seve~ mon~ be~& <br /> S~te Pool ~,770 $35,491 e~ec~d to see mo~ ~ ve~ sli~t ~p~jec~o~for~s~ 1994 <br /> S6,0~,347 $~295,914 ~venue ~ d~g 1994-95. Per- ve~ 1993 ~ve~sed~~ <br /> a ~e p~t few mon~ ~d ~ c~en~y <br /> ~ follows:* <br /> s.~ B~ of ~efica 1.8% <br />  '.~ Co~ssion on S~ F~ 3.9% <br /> '~ Econ Devel. Co~. of L A Co 3.5% <br /> ~.~ F~st ~te~mte B~ 3.5% <br /> ~.~ Pacific G~ & Elec~c 4.9% <br /> ...... ~ ........ ' ...... ~ ........... ~'~ ........ z'~ UCLA Fo~c~t~g Pmj~t 3.4% <br />ci,y ~ ~'~ Wells F~go Ba~ 3.0% <br /> ~.,y w~d, T~, Sd~"Per'Capi~ o ................ <br /> · a ~ ~ *S~: W~BI~p~Fo~ <br /> J~b. <br /> <br /> <br />