My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:201
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:201
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/28/2006 3:54:06 PM
Creation date
8/10/2006 2:32:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
8/15/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:201
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />The geotechnical report will also be peer reviewed by a qualified consulting geotechnical <br />engineer reporting to the City. A condition of approval requires that the peer review be <br />completed prior to City Council review of the development plan. If necessary, new conditions <br />of approval will be added to address any comments made by the consulting engineer. <br /> <br />Utilities <br /> <br />A utility plan has not been submitted at this juncture. A condition of approval requires a utility <br />plan be submitted for City Council approval as part of its review of the PUD development plan. <br /> <br />Tree Removal and Mitigation <br /> <br />A preliminary tree report has been prepared that specifies the species, size, health, and <br />suitability for preservation ("retention index") of the existing trees on the site that exceed six- <br />inches in diameter. A tree removal plan has also been provided. A total of 32 trees would need <br />to be removed to grade the building pads on the single-family lots, including 12 "heritage-sized" <br />trees (i.e., a tree which measures 35 feet or greater in height or which measures 55 inches or <br />greater in circumference). Tree species to be removed include blue oak, California buckeye, <br />Canary Island pine, eucalyptus, and Australian willow. In addition, the applicant is proposing to <br />remove six trees for aesthetic reasons. <br /> <br />A tree replacement plan will be prepared to mitigate the trees that are removed. A final tree <br />report will also be prepared that discusses the effects of the proposed development on the trees <br />and recommendations for any special precautions necessary for their preservation. A condition <br />of approval requires that the tree replacement plan and final tree report be submitted for City <br />Council approval as part of its review of the PUD development plan. The tree replacement plan <br />has been conditioned to conform to the tree replacement requirements of the Specific Plan. <br />Furthermore, unless a tree is dead, poses a safety risk, or would improve the health of the <br />woodland, staff believes that trees should not be removed for aesthetic reasons. <br /> <br />In the past, the Planning Commission has attempted to discourage tree loss in developments by <br />adding an extra requirement to contribute some measure of the value of such lost trees to the <br />City's Urban Forestry Fund. The arborist has valued the trees to be removed for the single- <br />family pad/lot grading at $64,568 (staff notes that six trees with "poor" ratings received a value <br />of zero dollars). <br /> <br />The arborist has valued the trees to be removed for the City water tank and tank road at $82,459 <br />(note: three of the tank trees to be removed, nos. 150-152, were not appraised). The value of the <br />18 additional trees that may need to be removed for the tank road is $66,969. Staff's <br />recommendation is to mitigate tree removal for the tank, access road, and single-family pad/lot <br />grading by on site tree revegetation at the 6: 1 ratio specified in the Specific Plan. The <br /> <br />Page -16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.