Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Ms. Stem then summarized the proposed changes in the Goals, Policies, and Programs: <br />· new goal on sustainability, which is directly related to preserving and protecting natural <br />resources and open space; <br />· revised program relating to the preservation of wildlife and habitats and corridors under <br />Policy 1; <br />· added programs for "Water Quality" to ensure the continued quality of water and <br />aquifers; <br />· new programs under Goal 4 and Policy 6 relating to minimizing stormwater runoff and <br />new programs under Policy 7 relating to the new "Clean Water Program" requirements; <br />· new Policy 11 and programs under a new section, "Open Space Parks and Recreation," <br />addressing preserving and expanding open space and access to open space, with the Parks <br />and Recreation policies previously included in this Element being moved to Public <br />Facilities and Community Programs Element; <br />· new goal and programs relating to open space trails, emphasizing the desire to have a <br />comprehensive system serving multiple uses referred to in the EBRPD plans and the <br />City's Community Trails Master Plan, and encouraging new development to provide <br />access to staging areas that can connect to existing public lands; <br />· new programs under "Agriculture and Grazing," supporting viticulture, agri-tourism, and <br />agricultural land presentation, and referring to the Tri-Valley Business Council's working <br />landscape plan; and <br />· deletion of the "Energy Conservation" section in view of the of the new Draft Energy <br />Element of the General Plan. <br /> <br />Ms. Stem requested the Commission to provide input and direction in terms of what changes it <br />would like to make prior to forwarding the Draft Element to the City Council. <br /> <br />Commissioner Fox distributed copies of the City of San Juan Capistrano's "Community Design <br />Goal 3: Preserve and enhance natural features." <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br /> <br />Mary Roberts, 1666 Frog Hill Lane, thanked staff for doing a marvelous and very informative <br />job, particularly with the trails section and the historic homes in the Downtown. She recalled <br />that with respect to Program 10.6: "Develop zoning districts with open space uses appropriate <br />for the adopted Open Space categories listed on the General Plan Map and that implement the <br />policies and programs of the General Plan," the Commission was very concerned with the <br />25 percent slope of the Open Space Hillside zoning. She noted that the only time this is <br />mentioned is in the Conservation and Open Space Element and possibly the Public Safety <br />Element, but not in the Land Use Element. <br /> <br />With respect to the Open Space Land section, "In order to encourage creative and flexible <br />projects in rural areas where the City permits limited development, the City uses its Planned Unit <br />Development zoning district," Ms. Roberts noted that the Commission had previously discussed <br />the deletion of the Rural Density Residential designation because it does not apply to <br />conservation and open space and suggested that it be combined with programs where any open <br />space and conservation areas are designated PUD. She pointed out that it can be confusing to <br /> <br />EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, May 24, 2006 <br /> <br />Page 2 of8 <br />