My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:208
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:208
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2006 12:53:12 PM
Creation date
8/25/2006 12:28:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
8/29/2006
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:208
DOCUMENT NAME
SR 06:208
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Page VIII - 3 9 <br /> <br />Commissioner Fox requested a minor rewording of Policy 8.2 as follows: "Design aeveleflments <br />natural open space areas adjacent to sand and gravel harvesting areas and Zone 7 water <br />retention lakes... to include a protective buffer zone, similar to that on the east side of Martin <br />Avenue, particularly north of Busch Road and aleng the Steneriage DFive SfleeiFie Plan }\rea <br />that are open to the public for recreation purposes. " <br /> <br />Ms. Harryman informed the Commission that, in reference to a conversation she recently had <br />with Commissioner Fox regarding the buffer zone on Martin Avenue, negotiations are taking <br />place with Zone 7 so it does not fence off the area and that a license agreement would be brought <br />before the Council for that purpose. She noted that although this is not regulatory in nature as <br />Zone 7 owns the property, the City would like to have this policy in place. <br /> <br />Ms. Stem clarified that the "Sand and Gravel" section refers to those areas that are active sand <br />and gravel quarries rather than those that have transitioned out of sand and gravel into <br />recreational uses. Commissioner Fox noted that Martin Avenue is no longer active and that <br />Lake I is currently being utilized for groundwater retention. <br /> <br />Page VII-40 <br /> <br />In response to Commissioner Blank's inquiry regarding whether "individual buildings and sites" <br />under Program 9.3 needed to be identified as either commercial or residential for clarification <br />purposes, Ms. Stern replied that no distinction is being made between the two. <br /> <br />Commissioner Olson noted that the terms "Wildlands Overlay" and "Open Space" seemed to be <br />used interchangeably and requested a definitional distinction between the two. Ms. Stem <br />explained that the "Open Space" designation included several different types of open space such <br />as for recreation or for grazing. She noted that some of those open space areas, particularly those <br />that have steep slopes, have an overlay known as "Wildlands Overlay." She clarified that <br />changing some areas from "Wildlands Overlay" to "Open Space" opens up more areas that <br />would be subject to the policy and would retain a broader ability to acquire land where <br />opportunities arose as opposed to narrowing them down to areas covered only by "Wildlands <br />Overlay." <br /> <br />Commissioner Fox noted that Program 10.1 might be a good place to insert the Tri-Valley <br />Conservancy section proposed by Ms. Roberts. Ms. Harryman suggested that the policy not be <br />limited to the Conservancy but to keep it open to include other possible groups. <br /> <br />Page VII-41 <br /> <br />In response to Commissioner Fox's request that the stricken phrase "ridgeline preservation <br />ordinance" be put back on Program 12.1, Ms. Stern replied that one already exists. <br />Commissioner Fox stated that there is a "Hillside Development Guidelines" but the ordinance <br />addresses only the Ridgelands on the west side of the City. She suggested that the City of San <br /> <br />EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, May 24, 2006 <br /> <br />Page 7 of8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.