Laserfiche WebLink
<br />7. Whether the proposed development plan conforms to the purposes of the PUD Dis- <br />trict: <br /> <br />The proposed PUD Development Plan sets forth the parameters for the development <br />of the subject property in a manner consistent with the Pleasanton General Plan and <br />with the surrounding area. The proposed PUD Development Plan implements the <br />purposes of the City's PUD Ordinance by providing a development consisting of 25 <br />new single-family detached homes and miscellaneous public infrastructure including <br />streets, sidewalks, utilities, etc. Through the proposed design augmented by the rec- <br />ommended conditions applied to the proposed PUD Development Plan, the project <br />will substantially conform to the requirements for development specified in the Plea- <br />santon General Plan. <br /> <br />Staff, therefore, believes that this finding can be made. <br /> <br />VIII. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br /> <br />Environmental review for the proposed project is covered by an Initial Study/Negative Declara- <br />tion, which is attached. Staff believes that the project-related impacts are mitigated, with the <br />mitigation measures incorporated in the project's design or referenced with conditions of ap- <br />proval, and that there would be no significant or unmitigated environmental impact. Staff, <br />therefore, believes that the Negative Declaration can be issued in conformance with the stan- <br />dards of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). If the Planning Commission con- <br />curs with this environmental assessment, it must make the finding that the Negative Declaration <br />is appropriate prior to recommending approval of the proposed project. <br /> <br />During the review of this proposal, staff received one public comment requesting that an Envi- <br />ronmental Impact Report be completed for this application. The proposed project is an infill <br />residential development on a large, flat, vacant property served by existing infrastructure and <br />surrounded by single-family developments. The impacts of this development are entirely within <br />the context of an infill project and can be mitigated through standard City and programs or can <br />be mitigated through the special conditions and requirements set forth with the draft conditions <br />of approval. Therefore, staff does not believe that this application requires the preparation of an <br />Environmental Impact Report. <br /> <br />IX. CONCLUSION <br /> <br />Staff believes that the proposed project is designed in a manner that is compatible with and sen- <br />sitive to the restrictions posed by the site and by surrounding properties. The proposed homes <br />are attractively designed and will be constructed on large lots reflecting the surrounding devel- <br />opment pattern. The proposal will reconstruct Cameron Avenue with a curvilinear alignment for <br />traffic calming; it will implement Green Building Measures; and it will include bio-retention <br />swales to treat its stormwater runoff. Staff, therefore, believes that the proposed development <br />merits a favorable recommendation from the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Item 6.e., PUD-50 <br /> <br />Page 28 of29 <br /> <br />June 28, 2006 <br />