Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ATIACHMENT 7 <br /> <br />PUD-50. Ponderosa Homes <br />Application to subdivide an approximately 19.83-acre site into 27 lots and to construct <br />25 new, one- and two-story single-family detached homes ranging in size from 3,908 square <br />feet to 4,595 square feet located at 3157 Trenery Drive and 2313 Martin Avenue. Zoning <br />for the property is PUD-LDR (Planned Unit Development - Low Density Residential) <br />District. <br /> <br />Also consider the Negative Declaration prepared for the project. <br /> <br />Ms. Decker summarized the staff report and described the background, layout, and scope of this <br />project. She noted that there were recent communications both in support and opposition of this <br />project and that a neighborhood meeting and a workshop had been held. The issue of a sidewalk <br />on Cameron A venue was prominent during the Planning Commission workshop, and the result <br />of the May 10 discussion was reflected in these plans. As a result of those discussions, a section <br />of Cameron Avenue from its intersection with Martin A venue easterly to the project boundary in <br />front of the Leuthauser/Ketell properties from Martin A venue was decreased from an existing <br />28-foot width to 26 feet, maintaining the existing roadway alignment. A curvilinear alignment <br />was provided in front of the project limits towards the Palmer Drive development. The Planning <br />Commission desired to create a street section and alignment that would inhibit faster speeds. <br />Staff notes that this alignment fell within the southerly edge of the right of way, and no property <br />would necessarily be coordinated or adjusted in order to provide the southerly edge of the <br />right-of-way. The northerly edge was within the development area. <br /> <br />Ms. Decker noted that on May 10, the inclusion of a sidewalk was discussed, including whether <br />it should be separated and the materials it should be have. A simple five-foot parkway was <br />discussed parallel to the alignment itself. The Plarming Commission supported a separation <br />through the middle area, reconnecting to the other edge to provide a parkway. Staff noted that <br />this configuration would provide a larger area for landscape that would effectively screen and <br />provide an opportunity for landscaping to shield and soften the new homes to be developed on <br />the north side. The comments from the residents were generally supportive of the architecture, <br />but there were concerns that there were not enough differentiation in the architecture for the <br />proposed homes. Some screening was desired to mitigate those concerns. <br /> <br />The neighbors, especially at the Martin A venue/Cameron A venue intersection, are concerned <br />that the property lines are shown to the center and within the right of way. Staff clarified that the <br />reduction from the 28-foot to a 26-foot right-of-way would allow for the construction of a <br />sidewalk along the north side that would be within the right-of-way currently held by the City. <br />She noted that Acting Traffic Engineer, Mike Tassano, would be able to answer questions related <br />to the preference of the Traffic Department and as reflected in discussions with the Police, Public <br />Works, and Planning Departments, which preferred a sidewalk on the north side of Cameron <br />Avenue. <br /> <br />Staff recommended that the Commission make the findings that the project will not have a <br />significant environmental impact and to recommend approval to the Council of the negative <br />declaration with a de minimus impact; find that the proposed PUD development plan conforms to <br />the Pleasanton General Plan and purposes of the PUD ordinance; make the PUD development <br /> <br />EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, June 28, 2006 <br /> <br />Page lof7 <br />