Laserfiche WebLink
<br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Fox regarding a bike lane on only one side, Mr. Jost <br />believed that would not be desirable. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Fox regarding whether the Municipal Code prohibited <br />bike riding on a sidewalk, Mr. Jost replied it was his experience that was not correct and that bikes <br />can use a sidewalk. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Chairperson Arkin regarding parking on a narrowed street, Mr. lost <br />replied that parking was generally allowed on one side of a 28-foot wide street. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Fox regarding allowing sidewalk materials that met ADA <br />requirements, Ms. Harryman replied that a public sidewalk must be ADA compliant. <br /> <br />Mr. Jost added that the sidewalk would have to be a hard surface; decomposed gravel would be fine <br />in the summer when it was dry, but it was not generally accessible in the winter because wheelchairs <br />would sink into the softer, wet surface. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Fox whether Ponderosa would bear the cost of utilities <br />such as the overhead and utility lines, Mr. Jost replied that normally, over 600 feet offrontage would <br />be required to make undergrounding feasible. Ponderosa did not intend to add more poles, which <br />PG&E was reluctant to do. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Fox regarding whether there was a danger of sinkholes <br />forming in the Lehman property in addition to Lake I, Mr. Jost replied that they were not aware of <br />any sinkholes in the buffer area. There was some settlement because of the large storm drain <br />installed, but he was not aware of any sinkholes resulting from groundwater in Lake I. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Blank regarding the concern about cut-through traffic <br />resulting from the creation of a road through the Selway property to Martin A venue, Ms. Decker <br />replied that staff did not believe that design was a preferred alternative in that it would create double <br />frontage lots and three intersections in close proximity which would present a safety issue as well. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner O'Connor regarding why a walkway for pedestrians <br />could not be installed through the Selway property, Ms. Decker replied that staff had considered that <br />alternative. The Police Department had stated that pedestrian access would be limited to ten feet in <br />width, with fencing on both sides, creating a tunnel effect. The Police Department did not like the <br />concept of pedestrians and children going through a small, narrow, visually obstructed path. <br /> <br />Commissioner Fox disclosed that she-communicated with Pam Hardy and one of the Selway family <br />members and had provided the principal of Mohr Elementary with the staff report and the alternative <br />plans prepared by Pam Hardy and staff. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br /> <br />Matt Lawer, 3750 Cameron Avenue, did not want to live by a four-way intersection and believed <br />there should be the same standards for alignment of all the streets. He believed there was a way to <br /> <br />EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, May 10,2006 <br /> <br />Page 2 of8 <br />