Laserfiche WebLink
<br />9. "Soil and Ground Water Quality Evaluation, Lehman/Selway Property, <br />Pleasanton, California", dated April 4, 2005, prepared for Ponderosa <br />Homes by Lowney Associates. <br />10. "Biological Section, Initial Study, Lehman/Selway Property", prepared by <br />Live Oak Associates, Inc., dated February 10, 2005. <br />I I. Ponderosa Home Traffic Study dated March 29, 2006 prepared by Michael <br />Tassano, Senior Traffic Engineer, City of Pleasant on. <br />12. Tree report for the Lehman-Selway property, dated February 23, 2006, pre- <br />pared by HortScience. <br />13. First Planning Commission Work Session Staff Report dated March 29, <br />2006. <br />14. Minutes of the Planning Commission's First Work Session meeting held on <br />March 29, 2006. <br />15. Second Planning Commission Work Session Staff Report dated May 10, <br />2006. <br />16. Draft Minutes of the Planning Commission's Second Work Session meet- <br />ing held on May 10, 2006. <br />17. Zoning Unit Map for RZ-97-02. <br />18. Map of the public notice area used for the neighborhood meeting and the <br />Planning Commission work session. <br />19. Project Chronology from Ponderosa Homes <br />20. Email communications from Eirc Carlson and Penelope Tamm on Cameron <br />Avenue <br />21. Summary from Email communications from neighbors. <br /> <br />I. BACKGROUND <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br />The proposed project is a request for PUD development plan approval to subdivide the 19.83- <br />acre Lehman-Selway property into 27 lots for 25 new single-family homes. This is the last, <br />large vacant site in the Mohr-Martin area of Pleasanton. In response to the neighbors' interest <br />and concerns, the Planning Commission conducted two public workshops; staff conducted a <br />neighborhood meeting; and Ponderosa Homes met with the neighbors at a series of neighbor- <br />sponsored and Ponderosa-sponsored meetings. <br /> <br />Based upon feedback from the Planning Commission, staff, and neighbors, Ponderosa Homes <br />revised its proposed development plan, which is now presented to the Planning Commission for <br />its review and recommendation. Although the proposal has been revised from its previous sub- <br />mittal - deleting one lot, rebuilding Cameron Avenue with a curvilinear alignment, and adding a <br />public sidewalk to the north side of Cameron Avenue from Palmer Drive to Martin Avenue - <br />there remains neighborhood concerns and opposition focused on the following issues: <br /> <br />Item 6.e.. PUD-50 <br /> <br />Page 20f29 <br /> <br />June 28. 2006 <br />