My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:242
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:242
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2006 2:05:17 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:09:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
10/17/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:242
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
348
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />porated into the City's management/maintenance plan of the open space area. Staff notes that <br />allowing the cattle grazing to continue will reduce the fuel potential of the open space areas. <br /> <br />Residential Fire Sprinkler Svstems <br /> <br />The homes of this development will be equipped with residential fire sprinkler systems. Lots 4, <br />5, and 6 are located above the 400-foot grade elevation, where the applicant is required to do the <br />following in order to provide adequate fire flow pressure to these lots <br /> <br />· A 2-inch domestic water line from the City water main to the water meter. <br />. A minimum I-inch meter. <br />· A pressure tank and electric booster pump for each home, which can be loeated in the ga- <br />rage, on a protected pad outside the home, etc. <br />· A minimum, sustained fire sprinkler system flow of 60 g.p.m. for 10 minutes in addition <br />to the minimum, domestic water demand of 5 g.p.m. <br />· The pressure tank and pump system shall be interconnected to the domestic service so <br />that this combination system is used for both the domestic and fire protection systems. <br /> <br />Design Guidelines <br /> <br />Review Proeedures <br /> <br />The Planning Commission prefers to have staff conduct the design review approval process for <br />these homes. It was suggested at the work session that the home designs be unique to these lots <br />for variety and that there be a limited use of stucco wall materials. To accomplish the Commis- <br />sion's goals, the building and landscape design guidelines provide detailed and comprehensive <br />landscape and building design standards - diagrams, photographs, and drawings - addressing <br />materials, massing, detailing, architectural types, planting, etc., for clear guidance to future <br />owners regarding all aspects of the designs of these homes. <br /> <br />The proposed guidelines also state the design review procedures for these homes. The first re- <br />view stage is peer review provided by the subdivision architect, Gorny & Associates. After this <br />stage is completed and the subdivision architeet has approved the design plans, formal applica- <br />tion for design review approval by the Zoning Administrator would then be made to the Plan- <br />ning Department. To inform the Planning Commission of the Zoning Administrator's actions, <br />staff suggests using the procedures being followed with the Mariposa Ranch homes by the Cal- <br />lippe Golf Course. With the notification of the Zoning Administrator's action sent to the Plan- <br />ning Commission, staff will provide the approval letter, conditions of approval, and the plan set <br />including colored building perspectives and building elevations. <br /> <br />Development Standards <br /> <br />The proposed development standards for Lots I through 8 stated in the building design guide- <br />lines match the setback standards of the West Foothill Road Corridor Overlay District. How- <br /> <br />Item 6.c.. PUD-58 and PGPA-I I <br /> <br />Page 19 of 34 <br /> <br />August 23, 2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.