Laserfiche WebLink
<br />6. Whether the proposed development plan conforms to the purposes of the PUD Dis- <br />trict: <br /> <br />The proposed PUD Development Plan sets forth the parameters for the development <br />of the subject property in a manner consistent with the Pleasanton General Plan, the <br />West Foothill Corridor Overlay District, and with the surrounding area. The proposed <br />PUD Development Plan implements the purposes of the City's PUD Ordinance by <br />providing a combined development consisting of eight single-family custom homes <br />and the transfer of 22 acres of open space land to the City. Through the proposed de- <br />sign augmented by the recommended conditions applied to the proposed PUD Devel- <br />opment Plan, the project will substantially conform to the requirements for develop- <br />ment specified in the Pleasanton General Plan and the West Foothill Corridor Overlay <br />District. <br /> <br />Staff, therefore, believes that this finding can be made. <br /> <br />XII. CONCLUSION <br /> <br />The proposal will create a development consisting of eight custom homes on large lots sur- <br />rounded by 22 acres or permanent open space area, with the open space area transferred to City <br />ownership as permanent open space. The proposed project is designed in a manner that is sensi- <br />tive and compatible with the site and nearby developments. Large, unobstructed view sheds of <br />the Pleasanton Ridge are preserved and, by maintaining the present cattle grazing taking place <br />on the site, will preserve the site's history as part of the former Meadowlark Dairy. The pro- <br />posed project implements the applicable policies and standards of the Pleasanton General Plan <br />and the West Foothill Road Corridor Overlay District. The proposal includes comprehensive <br />building and landscape design guidelines, and it will implement the City's Green Building ordi- <br />nance for residential structures. <br /> <br />Staff, therefore, believes that the proposed development merits a favorable recommendation <br />from the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />XIII. STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br />Staff recommends the Planning Commission forward Case PUD-58 and PGP A-II to the City <br />Council with a recommendation of approval by taking the following actions: <br /> <br />l. Find that the proposed project will not have a significant environmental impact and that <br />the Mitigated Negative Declaration is appropriate by adopting a resolution recommend- <br />ing approval of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration; <br /> <br />2. Find that the proposed amendment to the Pleasanton General Plan conforms to the goals <br />and policies of the General Plan and adopt a resolution reeommending approval of Case <br />PGP A-II, i.e., changing the land use designation of the 3D-acre Austin property from Ru- <br /> <br />Item 6.c., PUD-58 and PGPA-ll <br /> <br />Page33 of 34 <br /> <br />August 23, 2006 <br />