My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:242
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:242
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2006 2:05:17 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:09:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
10/17/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:242
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
348
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />between 3,500 and 8,000 square feet, or 25 percent of the FAR, whichever is less. The applicant <br />agreed that the trees in the common area will be planted with the offsite improvements, The <br />planting will precede construction of the houses by between three to 18 months. They would <br />plant additional15-gallon trees not shown on the landscaping plan for two of the homes on <br />Jorgensen Lane against their property to provide further shielding of the viewshed. He displayed <br />further photo simulations of the site. He pointed out the location of the deceleration lane and <br />added that the existing driveway of Old Foothill Road would be relocated and enlarged to <br />provide a benefit to the Alviso Adobe Park. <br /> <br />Chris Pattillo, landscape architect, PGA Design Landscape Architects, noted that the guiding <br />principle for this planned development was to use a light touch and to design something that <br />would be compatible and supportive of the Alviso Adobe Park. They intended to design the site <br />so the new homes will fit the property and minimize the impact on the existing topography. <br />They intended to retain as many trees as possible, including some heritage trees. They proposed <br />to predominately use species that are native to California in the new planting, especially those <br />that are endemic to the site. They also planned to restore the historic walnut grove and to use <br />natural materials, such as stone instead of brick. The historic white board fence would be used at <br />the park and along the development frontage; a simple open-wire mesh fence would be used at <br />the perimeter, with a single strand of barbed wire to keep the cows out. She noted that she saw <br />this as a revegetation project. <br /> <br />Joseph Gorny, project architect, Gorny and Associates, noted that they did not plan to implement <br />the severe grading as originally shown. They also worked on the orientation so they did not <br />feature a line of houses. By revising the project's grading, they also reduced the retaining walls <br />that had been much longer and up to a height of eight feet. He noted that the quality of <br />architecture for the guidelines were the same as they had written for Silver Oaks, with the <br />addition of adapting the architecture to a hillside site with more developed landscaping <br />guidelines, He emphasized the importance of adhering to the design guidelines. They believed <br />that additions should go through the entire design review process, particularly on a hillside home. <br />They also endeavored to reduce the massing on the hillside homes in form and materials. The <br />roofs followed the slopes, without a long series of gables. There would be no uplighting, and all <br />the lighting would face down to prevent light pollution. With respect to Chairperson Arkin's <br />request to change the wording from "wildly eclectic designs are discouraged" to "prohibited, " <br />he noted that the change had not been made in the copy presented to the Planning Commission, <br />but that change would be made on page 24, <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Chairperson Arkin regarding whether the homes would return to the <br />Planning Commission for approval, Mr. Pavan confirmed that the Commission wanted the <br />Zoning Administrator to be able to approve the designs without bringing each design application <br />to the Commission as a public hearing. The Commission encouraged both staff and the applicant <br />to model the procedures after the current Mariposa Ranch development by the Callippe golf <br />course. The applications will be peer reviewed by Mr. Gorny; the design applications will then <br />be subject to normal noticing and review procedures; and then the reductions and photos-visuals <br />will be submitted to the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, August, 23, 2006 <br /> <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.