My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:242
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:242
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2006 2:05:17 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:09:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
10/17/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:242
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
348
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Commissioner Arkin moved to: (1) find that the proposed project will not have a <br />significant environmental impact and that the Mitigated Negative Declaration is <br />appropriate and recommend approval ofthe Mitigated Negative Declaration; (2) find that <br />the proposed amendment to the Pleasanton General Plan conforms to the goals and policies <br />ofthe General Plan and recommend approval of Case PGP A-ll changing the land use <br />designation ofthe 30-acre Austin property from Rural Density Residential (1 du/5 ac) to <br />Low Density Residential (<2 du/ac) land uses; (3) find that the proposed PUD rezoning of <br />the subject property from A (Agriculture) District to PUD-LDR (Planned Unit <br />Development - Low Density Residential) District on the remaining 22 acres, and the <br />PUD development plan subdividing the subject property into eight custom home sites and <br />designating the remaining 22 acres as permanent open space conforms to the purposes of <br />the PUD ordinance; and (4) make the PUD development plan findings as stated in the staff <br />report and recommend approval of Case PUD-58, subject to the conditions of approval as <br />shown on Exhibit B of the staff report, as recommended by staff, with the modifications <br />that Condition No. 54 be deleted as it is already included in the design guidelines. <br />Commissioner Fox seconded the motion, <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSTAIN: <br />RECUSED: <br />ABSENT: <br /> <br />Commissioners Arkin, Blank, Fox, Olson, and Pearce. <br />None. <br />None. <br />None. <br />None. <br /> <br />Resolution Nos. PC-2006-43, recommending approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration; <br />PC-2006-44, recommending approval of the General Plan Amendment; and PC-2006-45, <br />recommending approval of PUD development plan, were entered and adopted as motioned. <br /> <br />EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, August, 23, 2006 <br /> <br />Page 4 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.