SR 06:242 - Laserfiche WebLink

6. Is the Planning Commission satisfied with the overall grading plan? The Commission could not assess the grading plan at this time. 7. Additional Commission input. Mr. Pavan inquired whether the Commission would like to see split-pad lots. Commissioner Fox noted that she did not wish to see the homes stacked up on the hill. Mr. Pavan noted that the applicant can superimpose the site plan on the grading plan to show the Commission that perspective. Commissioner Roberts did not want to see any garishly colored houses. Commissioner Fox would like to see a balance between open fencing and privacy for the homes. She would like to see a less formal, more natural landscaping plan for this rural area, with darker colors. She was somewhat concerned about the massing ofthe 8,OOO-square-foot development. She would like the home designs to come to the Commission. Commissioner Pearce complimented the applicants on their receptive approach to this project and indicated that she liked the architecture. Commissioner Fox liked the project and believed the dedication of the land was very generous. She strongly supported open space in perpetuity. Ms. Decker noted that staff would return with comments on the open space question and the traffic-calming measures at a future meeting under Matters Initiated by Commission Members. Commissioner Roberts liked the project very much and suggested naming the cows. No action was taken. EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, April 26, 2006 Page 4 of4