SR 06:242 - Laserfiche WebLink

Meadowlark Development - Austin Property - Environmental Checklist the City Council and Planning Commission Land Use Joint Workshop held on March 1,2006, At the work session, Bill Lide (8001 Jorgensen Lane) and Jeff and Cynthia Atherton (8037 Jorgen- sen Lane) commented favorably on the development concept. 10. MINERAL RESOURCES Environmental Setting The subject site has not been identified to have mineral resource deposits, Standards of Significance For purposes of this environmental document, an impact is considered significant if the proposcd project would: · Result in the depletion of a mineral resource. Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact Mineral Resources Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral D D D LKJ resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important D D D ~ mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or othcr land use plan? Discussion a-b) The proposed projcct site is not included or dclineated as a Mineral Resource Zone, Mining has not occurred on the project site, and implementation of the project would not affect the availabil- ity of any mineral resource. Therefore, this would be categorized as no-impact. 11. NOISE Environmental Setting External noisc sourccs that could affect the site includc low-level traffic noise from the 1-680 frceway to the east and from Foothill Road, Noise emanating from the site includes construction related noise from site grading and building construction. PGP A-ll/PUD-58/PTR-7813 Page 27 of 36 July 19,2006