SR 06:242 - Laserfiche WebLink

Meadowlark Development - Austin Property - Environmental Checklist Discussion a-c) By clustering the eight dwelling units proposed with this development and dedicating the re- maining land to the City as permanent open space land, the proposal is consistent with the poli- cies of the Pleasanton General Plan and the West Foothill Corridor Overlay District. Therefore, build out of the site docs not constitute direct or indirect growth inducing impacts for the City of Pleasanton. Thc proposed project site is a semi-vacant site, with the existing house to remain, that will not displace substantial numbers of people or requiring replacement housing be pro- vided. Thercfore, this would be categorized as less-than-significant-impact. 13. PUBLIC SERVICES Environmcntal Setting The City of Pleasanton has public services and infrastructure planned to meet the build out of the Gen- eral Plan, implemented by the Growth Management Plan. Standards of Significance For purposes of this environmental document, an impact is considered significant if the proposed project would: · Create an increase in demand for police protection services which could substantially interfere with the ability of the Police Department to provide adcquate response time to the project site; · Create an increased demand for fire protection services that would substantially interfere with the ability of the Fire Department to provide adequatc response time to the project site; · Crease an increased demand for schools that would exceed existing school capacity; or, · Crcate an increased demand for parks and other public facilities that would exceed existing ca- pacity, Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact Public Services Would the project: a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physi- cally altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the con- struction of which could causc significant environ- mcntal impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any ofthe public scrviccs: D D [KJ D PGPA-ll/PUD-58/PTR-7813 Page 30 of 36 July 19.2006