SR 06:242 - Laserfiche WebLink

Meadowlark Development - Austin Property - Environmental Checklist Discussion a,b,d) The proposed projcct consisting of a 8 single-family detached homes and public streets will not exceed projected wastewater treatment requirements and thcre are sufficient water supplies available to serve the project. Thcrefore, this would be a less than significant impact. c) New storm water drainage facilities will be constructed as a part of the project. Storm water pre- treatmcnt will bc implemented by constructed bio-retention swales then entering the storm sys- tem, Site drainage will not cause significant environmcntal effects. Thcrefore, this would be a less-than-significant-impact. 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Issues Mandatorv Findinl!:s of Sil!:nificance Would the project: a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the qual- ity of the environment, substantially reducc the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, re- duce the number or restrict the range of a rare or en- dangered plant or animal or eliminate important exam- ples of the major periods of California history or pre- history? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulativcly considerable? ("Cumula- tively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connec- tion with the effects of past projects, the cffects of other current projects, and the effects of probable fu- ture projects)? c) Does the project have environmental cffects, which will cause substantial adversc effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Discussion Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated No Impact Less Than Significant Impact D D [KJ D D D [KJ D o o [KJ o The project proposes to subdividc 30 acres into 8 buildable lots varying in size from 30,462 square feet (0,71 acres) to SO,928 square feet (1.1 7 acres). This development is consistent with the proposed land use designation of Low Density Residential (< 2,0 dulac) on 8,0 acres with a maximum density of 8 PGP A-ll/PUD-58/PTR-7813 Page 35 of 36 July 19, 2006