Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Page I of I <br /> <br />Natalie Amos <br /> <br /> <br />From: <br />Sent: Thursday, August 31,20069:43 AM <br />To: Natalie Amos <br />Subject: Re: Mediation <br /> <br />It does seem unfair that a decision could be reached behind closed doors on an issue that effects my <br />home without my being allowed to express my concerns. If I had known this would be the case I would <br />have filed my own appeal in the first place. Instead, I was told I did not need to by the City. This seems <br />very unjust particularly as the Knights have been unyielding in their planned expansion so far. <br /> <br />Natalie Amos <namoS@Ci.pleasanton.ca.us> wrote: <br /> <br />Dear Tim, <br /> <br />Unfortunately I will have to retract the invitation that was previously extended to you regarding the <br />mediation meeting. Per the Planning Commissions condition, the mediation is limited to the Knights, <br />Georgatos, Peter Shutts, and a neighbor. Since Ms. Wensel has shadowing concerns, she has been <br />invited to attend the meeting as the third neighbor. I apologize for the retraction and if you have any <br />questions please let me know. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />Natalie E. Amos <br />Assistant Planner <br />CITY OF PLEASANTON <br />(925) 931-5613 <br /> <br />Planning and Community Development <br />200 Old Bernal Avenue <br />P.O. Box 520 <br />Pleasanton, CA 94566 <br /> <br />10/3/2006 <br />