My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:245
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:245
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2006 12:28:34 PM
Creation date
11/3/2006 12:20:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
11/7/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:245
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
265
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Page I of2 <br /> <br />Natalie Amos <br /> <br />From: Natalie Amos <br />Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 8:26 AM <br />To: 'Ron Imperiale' <br />Subject: RE: PADR-1472 <br /> <br />Dear Ron, <br /> <br />Thank you for your comments regarding the staff report for this Thursday's Zoning Administrator Hearing. I will <br />pass your additional comments to the Principal Planner and discuss them with her prior the hearing. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />Natalie E. Amos <br />Assistant Planner <br />CITY OF PLEASANTON <br />(925) 931.5613 <br /> <br />Planning and Community Development <br />PO Box 520 <br />Pleasanton, CA 94566 <br /> <br />-----Orlginal Message-m- <br />From: Ron Imperiale [mailt <br />Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 8:06 PM <br />To: Natalie Amos <br />Subject: PADR-1472 <br /> <br /> <br />Natalie: <br /> <br />First of alii would like to thank you for your professionalism and attention to our request and concerns. I <br />realize is very difficult at times to mediate issues such as this. <br /> <br />In response to the zoning administration hearing notes. <br /> <br />Item II. Site and Neighborhood Description <br /> <br />East Angela is sloped as noted but the original design allowed double story homes in cui de sacs as noted <br />in the aerial of second story homes "exhibit C". Other sloped areas allowed double story homes only on the <br />higher or raised areas. <br /> <br />Item IV Municipal Code Conformance <br /> <br />The staffs analysis recognizes the fact that the proposed project is "expanding the building envelope". It <br />also mis-states that the buildings will blend in with neighborhood character and does not impact public <br />views. The neighbors are the public. <br /> <br />The staff has also neglected to recognize Sec.18.32.010 <br />Item B. To ensure adequate light, air, privacy and open space for each dwelling. <br />Item C. To protect one-family dwellings from lack of privacy. <br />Item I to protect residential properties from unsightliness and other objectionable influences. <br />The staff has note addressed Sec. 18.04.010 Objectives <br />Item B <br /> <br />6/9/2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.