Laserfiche WebLink
<br />move forward with a conversion to provide services to all affected tenants, get them <br />thinking about home ownership, and provide them with resources to make those hard <br />decisions a little bit easier. He feels it is a tough balance between the property owner's <br />rights and the realities of living in this housing market. Ifwe leverage some of the <br />resources that we have already invested in providing homebuyer education, we could <br />make that decision-making process easier. He also feels that we should maintain the 120 <br />affordability threshold at 25%. <br /> <br />Chairperson Harris commented on the issue of a 15% versus 25% affordability threshold. <br />He feels that we are granting a privilege to someone by allowing apartments to be <br />removed to be replaced by ownership condominiums which will not be affordable to the <br />same group of people. He feels that owners should have to pay some type of premium. <br />He observed that the IZO requirement for multi-family housing is 25% (low and very <br />low) which is 5% more than the 20% requirement for single-family housing (moderate, <br />low, and very low). A compromise could be 20% low and very low or perhaps 25% low, <br />very-low and moderate. Mr. Harris discussed the time line for tenant decision and asked <br />if it is reasonable to expect tenants to be able to arrange financing within a six-month <br />time frame. <br /> <br />A discussion of the affordability mix and threshold took place. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hodgett commented that she thinks that the proposed IZO amendment <br />would allow units to be priced up to the moderate level. Ms. Hodgett commented that <br />"affordable by design" condos are not necessarily affordable but only "less expensive." <br />She stated that there is a need for affordable rental housing. <br /> <br />It was moved by Vice Chairperson Hodgett to recommend approval of the revised <br />Condominium Conversion Ordinance to the City Council per the staff <br />recommendation with the following exceptions or clarifications: 1) add a one-year <br />extension to the expiration approval for a total of two years; and 2) retain the <br />current language regarding the six-month timeline for a deeision regarding unit <br />purchase. Motion died for lack of a second. <br /> <br />A discussion took place regarding the six-month period. <br /> <br />It was moved by Chairperson Harris, seconded by Commissioner Jones, to <br />recommend approval of the revised Condominium Conversion Ordinance to the <br />City Council per the staff recommendation with the following exceptions or <br />clarifications: 1) modify the timeline for a decision regarding unit purchase to allow <br />the buyer a total of six months to obtain preliminary financing approval; and 2) <br />clarify that the 25% affordability requirement can include units affordable at the <br />moderate-income level. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stark stated that he is concerned regarding the 25% affordability threshold <br /> <br />Page - 6 - <br />