My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:263
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:263
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/6/2007 11:06:23 AM
Creation date
11/29/2006 12:20:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
12/5/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:263
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />move forward with a conversion to provide services to all affected tenants, get them <br />thinking about home ownership, and provide them with resources to make those hard <br />decisions a little bit easier. He feels it is a tough balance between the property owner's <br />rights and the realities of living in this housing market. Ifwe leverage some of the <br />resources that we have already invested in providing homebuyer education, we could <br />make that decision-making process easier. He also feels that we should maintain the 120 <br />affordability threshold at 25%. <br /> <br />Chairperson Harris commented on the issue of a 15% versus 25% affordability threshold. <br />He feels that we are granting a privilege to someone by allowing apartments to be <br />removed to be replaced by ownership condominiums which will not be affordable to the <br />same group of people. He feels that owners should have to pay some type of premium. <br />He observed that the IZO requirement for multi-family housing is 25% (low and very <br />low) which is 5% more than the 20% requirement for single-family housing (moderate, <br />low, and very low). A compromise could be 20% low and very low or perhaps 25% low, <br />very-low and moderate. Mr. Harris discussed the time line for tenant decision and asked <br />if it is reasonable to expect tenants to be able to arrange financing within a six-month <br />time frame. <br /> <br />A discussion of the affordability mix and threshold took place. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hodgett commented that she thinks that the proposed IZO amendment <br />would allow units to be priced up to the moderate level. Ms. Hodgett commented that <br />"affordable by design" condos are not necessarily affordable but only "less expensive." <br />She stated that there is a need for affordable rental housing. <br /> <br />It was moved by Vice Chairperson Hodgett to recommend approval of the revised <br />Condominium Conversion Ordinance to the City Council per the staff <br />recommendation with the following exceptions or clarifications: 1) add a one-year <br />extension to the expiration approval for a total of two years; and 2) retain the <br />current language regarding the six-month timeline for a deeision regarding unit <br />purchase. Motion died for lack of a second. <br /> <br />A discussion took place regarding the six-month period. <br /> <br />It was moved by Chairperson Harris, seconded by Commissioner Jones, to <br />recommend approval of the revised Condominium Conversion Ordinance to the <br />City Council per the staff recommendation with the following exceptions or <br />clarifications: 1) modify the timeline for a decision regarding unit purchase to allow <br />the buyer a total of six months to obtain preliminary financing approval; and 2) <br />clarify that the 25% affordability requirement can include units affordable at the <br />moderate-income level. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stark stated that he is concerned regarding the 25% affordability threshold <br /> <br />Page - 6 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.