Laserfiche WebLink
<br />EXHIBIT G <br /> <br />PUD-93-02-08M1PCUP-181. Mike Callahan/Stealth Street Partners <br />Application for a major modification to the Ruby Hill PUD development plan to allow the <br />construction of an approximately 19,716-square-foot event center with a 4,800-square-foot <br />winery and for a conditional use permit to allow alcoholic beverage service at the event <br />center after 10:00 p.m. The property is located at the southwest corner of Vineyard and <br />[sabel Avenues, south of Ruby Hill Drive, and is zoned PUD-LDR (Planned Unit <br />Development - Low Density Residential) District. <br /> <br />Also consider the Negative Declaration prepared for the project. <br /> <br />Ms. Decker summarized the staff report and described the background, layout, and scope of this <br />project. <br /> <br />[n response to an inquiry by Commissioner Olson regarding whether the project would connect <br />to the City of Livermore facilities, Ms. Decker confirmed that it would, She added that it was <br />part ofa blanket condition that the City of Livermore's requirements must be met. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Pearce regarding valet parking, Ms, Decker replied <br />that the customers would drive into the site, and valet parking would be provided at an on-site <br />location. Commissioner Pearce noted that there was a small shortage of parking and inquired <br />whether staff believed the on-site parking was adequate; Ms. Decker confirmed that staff <br />believed it would not be a problem. The valet parking would expedite circulation on the site, and <br />parking at the winery production location itself would be used, <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Pearce regarding why a traffic study was not <br />performed, Ms, Decker replied that at the time the Mitchell Katz Winery was reviewed, the <br />actual hours of operations were off-peak hours (evenings and weekends). Therefore, the Traffic <br />Engineer did not believe a traffic study would be necessary in this similar use. There was an <br />acknowledgement that there may be events in both wineries that may coincide, which led to the <br />condition of approval that if there was an issue, a deceleration lane as well as a left-turn pocket <br />would be provided. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank noted that he did not see a reference in the noise section of the conditional <br />use permit regarding a particular decibel threshold to serve as a basis for revoking the use permit <br />in the event the noise became a nuisance for the neighbors. Ms. Decker noted that staff did not <br />wish to duplicate standard conditions and that the applicants must comply with the ordinance. If <br />there were cause for complaint above and beyond the ordinance, they would be able to call the <br />City. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank expressed concern that there may be noise that did not exceed the noise <br />ordinance but was bothersome to the neighbors. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner O'Connor regarding whether the existing buildings <br />would be accessed from the farm road, Ms. Decker confirmed that was her understanding. She <br />also indicated that the below-standard number of parking spaces at the Mitchell Katz Winery had <br />not become a problem. <br /> <br />EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, October 25, 2006 <br /> <br />Page 1 of9 <br />