My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:287
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:287
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/3/2007 4:25:02 PM
Creation date
12/13/2006 3:40:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
12/19/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:287
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Ruby Hill Event Center <br />PUD-93-02-08M <br /> <br />may exceed some ofthe established BAAQMD emissions standards, however, <br />construction activity on the site is required to implement dust control measures (e.g., <br />periodic watering of the site, cover all trucks hauling soil, sand, and other loose material, <br />etc.) to control airborne particulate. All construction equipment is required to meet all <br />current exhaust standards for emissions. <br /> <br />Long-term operational emissions would be generated by both stationary and mobile <br />sources as a result of normal day-to-day activities on site subsequent to construction <br />completion. Stationary area source emission would be generated by the consumption of <br />natural gas for space (HV AC) and water heating devices and operation of landscape <br />maintenance equipment. Mobile source emissions would be generated by motor vehicles <br />traveling to and from the project site. The anticipated weekend vehicular traffic to and <br />from the event center will result in small, incremental, and insignificant increases. <br />Therefore, this would be a less-than-significant-impact. <br /> <br />e) Odors created during construction would be limited to exhaust from heavy equipment and <br />materials, which is not generally considered objectionable. Therefore, this would be a <br />less-than-significant-impact. <br /> <br />4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES <br /> <br />Environmental Setting <br /> <br />Wetlands are regulated under federal, state and local laws, regulations and policies. Primary <br />wetland regulatory compliance is under the federal Clean Water Act, the California Department <br />ofFish and Game (CDFG), United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and California <br />Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). <br /> <br />The Clean Water Act requires avoidance of wetlands whenever a practicable alternative exists. <br />For unavoidable impacts, the regulatory agencies have policies calling for mitigation to provide <br />"no net loss" of acreage or habitat value. Under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, a permit <br />must be obtained for the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States. <br />Under the CDFG code, Sections 1601-1607 regulate projects with divert, obstruct, or change the <br />natural flow, bed, channel, or bank of a river, stream, or lake. Proponents of such projects must <br />notif'y CDFG and enter into a streambed alteration agreement. CDFG normally exerts <br />jurisdiction over natural streams and artificial channels that have habitat value for wildlife <br />species. The jurisdiction extends to the bank top. <br /> <br />Standards of Significance <br /> <br />For purposes of this environmental document, an impact is considered significant if the proposed <br />project would: <br /> <br />. Adversely affect, either directly or through habitat modification, any endangered, <br />threatened or rare species, as listed in Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations <br />(Sections 670.5) or in Title 50, Code of Regulations (Sections 17.11 or 17.12 or their <br /> <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.