My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
23
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
011607
>
REGULAR MEETING
>
23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2007 12:07:47 PM
Creation date
1/11/2007 3:15:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
1/16/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
23
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
157
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />of the adjacent properties to comment on the proposed plan and to determine any issues they had <br />with the proposed application. Fourteen residents attended this meeting and commented on the <br />proposed plans. Comments from this meeting are detailed on Exhibit C, attached. <br /> <br />Neighbors from the Pleasanton Village neighborhood (south of the subject site) wanted adequate <br />parking to be provided on the project site in order to prevent parishioners from parking in front <br />of their homes, which they indicated currently occurs during Sunday services. It was noted that <br />the parishioners who park in the Pleasanton Village neighborhood walk to the church via the <br />area described above between Bowen Street and the church parking lot that provides a short cut. <br />It was suggested that resident only permit parking be established in the Pleasanton Village <br />neighborhood. Noise impacts, safety/security, and screening concerns were also raised. <br /> <br />The neighbors mentioned several traffic-related concerns that they were currently experiencing <br />in their neighborhood, including speeding along Rheem Drive, difficulty making left turns from <br />Rheem Drive onto Stoneridge Drive after church services end, and aggressive driving by <br />parishioners. The neighbors were concerned that the parish center would increase these <br />problems. A representative of the Pleasanton Village homeowners association indicated that it <br />had previously had asked the City to stripe a centerline down Rheem Drive and to install a <br />flashing speed limit sign. Neighbors also questioned if the church's existing Rheem Drive <br />driveway could be eliminated and a new driveway be installed along Stoneridge Drive or <br />another location away from residents. <br /> <br />Some neighbors requested that the parish center building be relocated to the eastern end of the <br />site on the other side of the church or "flipped" at its present location so that the taller <br />gymnasium portion of the building would be located further away from their homes. Some <br />neighbors also felt that the building was too tall and requested that its height be lowered. <br /> <br />The neighbors' questions/comments/concerns have been addressed within the "Analysis" <br />section below. <br /> <br />V. ANALYSIS <br /> <br />Parish Center Use <br /> <br />Uses on the church site are governed by the 1989 conditional use permit which granted church <br />and related uses on the entire site, except that separate conditional use permit approval was <br />required for the future elementary school use. Because the parish center building with <br />gymnasium would be used for church related uses, no modification to the existing conditional <br />use permit is required. <br /> <br />PDR-561/PV-158 <br /> <br />Planning Commission <br /> <br />Page 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.